Monthly Archives: January 2008

THE 2008 CAMPAIGN: FLORIDA PRIMARIES

REPUBLICANS MAKE FINAL PITCHES IN FLORIDA

Yana Paskova for The New York Times

Supporters waited for Mike Huckabee to arrive at a polling place in Tampa on Tuesday. More Photos >

________________________________________________________________________

Annie Tritt for The New York Times

Voters cast their ballots in Miami on Tuesday. More Photos >

Published: January 29, 2008
Republican candidates made last minute appearances to rally supporters in the hotly contested Florida primary on Monday morning, as voters trooped to the polls under sunny skies.

Photograph Your Polling Place
Photograph Your Polling Place

Capture, post and share photographs of the Florida primaries.

Blog

The Caucus

The CaucusThe latest political news from around the nation. Join the discussion.

The campaigns all predicted a high turnout, and noted that besides the important Republican primary, there is a proposed constitutional amendment on the ballot to overhaul property taxes, which has generated great interest.

But Sterling Ivey, a spokesman for the Florida Department of State, said that it would not be possible to gauge turnout until later Tuesday evening. Weather in Florida is expected to be good throughout the day, with sun and temperatures in the 60s and 70s, according to forecasters at Penn State University.

State election officials said roughly 6,900 polling places were open, and Mr. Ivey said no problems had been reported with machines.

Senator John McCain met with Governor Charlie Crist on Tuesday morning at a polling place in St. Petersburg near the governor’s high-rise condominium. There were not many voters in evidence, but there were plenty of cameras and a handful of sign-waving McCain supporters there to provide a backdrop for the photo opportunity.

“It’s a true honor to stand with this American hero, a tremendous United States Senator and a great leader for our country,” Mr. Crist, a Republican, said. “I was proud to endorse him on Saturday evening. I hope it helps the guy.”

Mr. McCain took the microphone and quickly lit into his principal rival here, Mitt Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts. He said that Mr. Romney had spent millions of dollars on advertisements against him here, as he had elsewhere. Mr. Romney had even stooped so low, in Mr. McCain’s estimation, to brand him a “liberal.”

“That was particularly entertaining,” Mr. McCain said. He then repeated his charge, which has only a tangential relationship to the truth, that Mr. Romney last spring had advocated a timetable for withdrawal of American troops from Iraq.

“I’m the only candidate who has the experience, the background and the knowledge to take on the challenge of radical Islamic extremism,” Mr. McCain said. “Governor Romney has no experience there.”

Mr. Romney, appearing before about 150 supporters in a ballroom in Tampa, said his experience in dealing with the economy distinguished him from his rivals.

“One of the candidates out there said the economy is not his strong suit,” said Mr. Romney. “Well, it’s my strong suit.”

That led to a round of chants from the crowd: “Mitt is it! Mitt is it!”

Mr. Romney labored through his stump speech, shrugging off a bottle of water, despite his cracking voice.

“I don’t think water is going to help me,” he said.

At the end, Mr. Romney, who has articulated a hard-line stance on illegal immigration, made sure to praise legal immigration, bringing up on stage some people who had just been sworn in as American citizens a few rooms away at the Tampa Convention Center. Later, he worked a line of the newly minted citizens who were waiting to apply for passports.

Al Cardenas, Mr. Romney’s Florida campaign chairman, said he hoped that many of the undecided voters are conservatives who will break for Romney. He also said that an important factor is how many of Mr. Huckabee’s supporters Mr. Romney can peel away.

“My sense is moderates have already made up their minds,” he said.

Florida elections officials said a large number of voters have already cast absentee ballots or early votes. Mr. Ivey, of the Department of State, said 875,000 early and absentee ballots had been cast by Saturday in the presidential primaries. Of those, 470,000 were by Republicans and 404,000 were by Democrats.

The Florida primary has been an unusual race for the Democratic Party because the Democratic National Committee has said it would not seat delegates from Florida after the state party moved its primary to January.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/29/us/politics/30cnd-primary.html?hp=&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1201636925-3Y07NYFU5pTpVKtvFO9E6A

RELATED LINKS:

http://realtime.com/realtime_news/18193130_florida_primary_could_boost_gop_winner.html?pageid=nandu.home&pageregion=A4

******************************************************************************************************

FLORIDA:  VOICES OF THE VOTERS:

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2008/01/29/us/politics/20080129_FLORIDA_PRIMARY_FEATURE.html#

In six cities across the state, voters spoke out about the issues that brought them to the polls.

*****************************************************************************************************

MAPS OF FLORIDA:

Florida counties map.png
MAP OF FLORIDA COUNTIES

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Florida population map.png
FLORIDA POPULATION DENSITY MAP BASED ON THE 2000 CENSUS

Florida maps courtesy of Wikipedia.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

19 BURNED TO DEATH IN VIOLENCE IN KENYA

Peter Andrew/Reuters

Kenyan Army soldiers remove stones blocking the road in the town of Naivasha.

Published: January 28, 2008
NAIROBI, Kenya — Ethnically driven violence intensified in Kenya on Sunday, and police officials said at least 19 people, including 11 children, were burned to death in a house by a mob.

The New York Times

 

Even the Kenyan military, deployed for the first time to stop antagonists from attacking one another, has been unable to halt the wave of revenge killings.

More than 100 people have been killed in the past four days, many of them shot with arrows, burned or hacked with machetes.

It is some of the worst fighting since a disputed election in December ignited long-simmering tensions that have so far claimed at least 750 lives. The fighting appeared to be spreading Sunday across the Rift Valley region, a particularly picturesque part of Kenya known more for its game parks and fancy lodges.

The Kenyan government is now threatening to arrest top opposition leaders on suspicion of orchestrating the bloodshed, but opposition leaders are in turn accusing the government of backing criminal gangs.

According to police officials in the Rift Valley town of Naivasha, fighting erupted Sunday morning between gangs of Kikuyus and Luos, two of Kenya’s biggest ethnic groups, who have clashed across the country since the election. Witnesses said mobs threw flaming tires and mountains of rocks into the streets to block police officers from entering some neighborhoods. The mobs then went house to house, looking for certain people.

Grace Kakai, a police commander in Naivasha, said a large crowd of Kikuyus chased a group of Luos through a slum, trapped them in a house, blocked the doors and set the house afire. Police found 19 bodies huddled in one room, and Ms. Kakai said some of the children’s bodies were so badly burned that they could not be identified.

“All I can say is that they were school age,” she said.

The episode was similar to one on Jan. 1, when up to 50 women and children seeking shelter in a church in another Rift Valley town were burned to death by a mob. The victims in that case were mostly Kikuyus, and Kikuyus across the country seem to have been attacked more than any other group.

In the past few days, many Kikuyus have organized into militias, saying they are now ready for revenge.

“The situation is very bad,” Ms. Kakai said. “People are fighting each other and trying to drive them out of the area. We have to evacuate people.”

Thousands of families are streaming out of Naivasha, Nakuru, Molo, Eldoret and other towns across the Rift Valley, which has become the epicenter of Kenya’s violence. The province is home to supporters of both Mwai Kibaki, Kenya’s president, and Raila Odinga, the top opposition leader, and the site of historic land disputes between members of rival ethnic groups.

Mr. Kibaki is a Kikuyu and Mr. Odinga is a Luo, and the disputed election, in which Mr. Kibaki was declared the winner by a narrow margin despite widespread evidence of vote rigging, set off the ethnically driven violence.

The Kenya of today is almost unrecognizable compared with the Kenya that until recently was celebrated as one of the most stable and promising countries on the African continent. On Sunday night, local television stations showed menacing young men waving machetes and iron bars at roadblocks along one of the country’s busiest highways. The men threw rocks at buses, with one large bus run off the road, as police officers stood by.

The Kenyan Army was assigned early this month to help evacuate people from conflict zones, but on Friday, for the first time, soldiers were ordered to intervene between warring groups. That did not seem to make much of a difference, and witnesses said the soldiers had been as ineffective as the police.

A dusk-to-dawn curfew has been imposed in several Rift Valley towns, including Naivasha and Nakuru, but witnesses said violence continued to rage in the countryside, with bands of armed men burning down huts and attacking ethnic rivals.

Many Kenyans have said the most distressing aspect is that the opposing politicians, instead of cooperating to stop the bloodshed, continue to bicker over who started it.

That is exactly what happened on Sunday after news of the Naivasha killings spread. Salim Lone, Mr. Odinga’s spokesman, sent out a cellphone message calling the killings “ghastly” and saying that they were the work of criminal gangs backed by police officers and “part of a well orchestrated plan of terror.”

“The government is doing this to try to influence mediation efforts,” the message said, referring to the continuing but so far fruitless negotiations led by Kofi Annan, the former secretary general of the United Nations. “After stealing the elections from Kenyans, Kibaki now wishes to deny them justice and peace.”

Alfred Mutua, a government spokesman, called the accusations “ridiculous.”

“What is really happening is a continuation of the ethnic cleansing that Raila’s people are doing to kill the president’s people,” he said.

Mr. Mutua said the violence would stop “when we indict the leaders responsible for this.”

“We are working on indictments,” he said Sunday night. “That will happen very soon.”

Western diplomats have said there is a debate raging within Mr. Kibaki’s inner circle about the wisdom of arresting top opposition figures, with some advisers pushing for it, while others fear that the violence will only get worse if the leaders are jailed because their supporters will go on an even more intense rampage.

Kenyan newspapers reflected the gloom. “For the umpteenth time, we again ask President Kibaki and Orange Democratic Movement leader Mr. Raila Odinga to work for peace, truth and justice,” said an editorial in The Sunday Standard. “Kenya has bled enough.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/28/world/africa/28kenya.html?ref=world

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

SEXUAL CONSEQUENCES OF FEMALE INITIATION RITES IN AFRICA

Here’s another expert with answers for the Lab readers who have been debating female initiation rites in Africa. Lucrezia Catania is a gynecologist and sexologist in Florence, Italy, at the Research Center for Preventing and Curing Complications of FGM/C (Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting). For more than two decades, the center has been treating women who have undergone these procedures, especially those with complications from the type called infibulation.Dr. Catania considers the various forms of FGM/C to be a violation of human rights. She has worked to discourage these procedures and to promote alternative “symbolic” initiation rites that don’t have lasting effects. But she’s also concerned that the Westerners promoting “zero tolerance” policies are inadvertently hurting some women in Africa, and immigrants from Africa, because the opponents don’t understand these rituals and their consequences.Dr. Catania says that she and her colleagues were surprised themselves at the results of four studies they published last year, in the Journal of Sexual Medicine, examining the sexual responses and attitudes of women who had undergone various forms of FGM/C. The majority of the women in the study had undergone infibulation, an extreme (and relatively uncommon) form of genital alteration in which part or all of the external genitalia are excised and the vaginal opening is partially sealed. (Dr. Catania notes that in the various forms of FGM/C, when an external part of the clitoris is excised, an internal portion of it remains because it is not possible to uproot the entire organ.)Here’s a summary that Dr. Catania wrote for Lab readers of the investigation:

Our findings suggest, without doubt, that healthy ” mutilated”/”circumcised” women who did not suffer grave long-term complications and who have a good and fulfilling relationship, may enjoy sex and have no negative impact on psychosexual life (fantasies, desire and pleasure, ability to experience orgasm ).

The majority of the interviewed women reported that sex gives them pleasure. Women claiming to achieve orgasm described the effects that characterize the greatest moment of pleasure that they would define as orgasm giving detailed descriptions: involuntary pleasurable rhythmic contractions of the vagina, pulsations of internal genitals, and the feeling of warmth all over the face and the body.

The possibility of FGM/C women enjoying sex represents an enigma for Western people. At the beginning of our investigation, we were incredulous regarding the results we had obtained. Human sexuality depends on a complex interaction of cognitive processes, relational dynamics, and neurophysiological and biochemical mechanisms.

The cultural meaning of the FGM/C in the samples of the present studies was often positively connoted because the women who went through this dangerous experience felt heroic, honorable, and special. Some women reported fearful childhood memories and displeasure with their present condition; nevertheless, the vast majority of them reported feelings of happiness the day after the operation and showed pride in their present condition. Also, the body image/genital image is culturally influenced: women in the present studies considered the intact genitals awful and dirty, and they considered women with intact genitals not fully female, with a highly developed sexuality, and they believed that uncircumcised women cannot be faithful.

Surprisingly, the same study on sexuality conducted on the new generation (young girls with various types of FGM/C) reported presence of orgasm but with less frequency compared with the group of adults. These young ladies were living in Italy but had been circumcised/infibulated in their country during childhood. As children in their own country, they experienced positive feelings about FGM/C and a sense of female completeness; they lived in a setting of social acceptance, felt family love and thought that FGM/C was “something that testified beauty and courage.”

Growing up in Western countries, their experience was transformed and given negative meanings: female mutilation, social stigma; they were depicted as victims of family violence and barbarity. Their sense of beauty changed into ugliness. The social stigmatization and the negative messages from the media regarding their “permanently destroyed” sexuality provoke negative expectations on the possibility of experiencing sexual pleasure and provoke negative feelings about their own body image. The social criticism and the negative cultural meaning regarding their experience cause distortion of their cultural values and they undergo a sort of “mental/psychological” infibulation which could result in iatrogenic sexual dysfunction.

In FGM/C women, when their culture makes them live their “alteration/modification/mutilation” as a positive condition, orgasm is experienced. When there is a cultural conflict, the frequency of the orgasm is reduced even if the anatomical and physiological conditions make it possible. Sexologists should pay attention to sexual education when it is conditioned by cultural influence as it can change the perception of pleasure and can inhibit orgasm.

Dr. Catania says that it’s difficult for these African immigrants to get proper medical help in the West because so many doctors and researchers misunderstand their situation. “Many researchers are scared of saying that women with FGM/C can experience a normal sexuality; others refuse to accept this idea, considering it impossible a priori,” Dr. Catania says. “But responsible doctors need to become aware of real effects–not just imagined ones–caused by FGM/C, which are quite variable.” Many women decline to accept medical help, she says, because of the hostility and ignorance they encounter.

Dr. Catania and Dr. Abdulcadir Omar Hussen, the head of the center in Florence, worked with Somalian women in Italy to devise a cultural compromise for immigrant families that could not be persuaded, despite education programs, to give up their tradition of “circumcision.” This alternative “symbolic” circumcision devised by the Somalian women, Dr. Catania explains, was a hospital procedure that “involves a light prick (puncture) with a small needle on the mucous membrane which covers the clitoris after a local and transitory anesthetic. The very light ‘lesion’ will heal in a few hours without complications.”

This compromise was endorsed by a regional bioethics committee, Dr. Catania says, but it was ultimately never offered because of opposition from zero-tolerance advocates and criticism in the press that it amounted to a “soft” infibulation. (For a parallel case in America, see this account of a Seattle hospital’s attempt to introduce a similar compromise, which was also rejected after a public outcry.)

“It is clear,” Dr. Catania says, “that many many journalists and some institutional representatives do not have adequate information about this topic.”

http://tierneylab.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/14/the-sexual-consequences-of-an-african-initation-rite/?scp=1-b&sq=women+in+africa&st=nyt

RELATED LINKS:

W.H.O. RESPONDS ON FGM    http://tierneylab.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/25/who-responds-on-fgm/

CULTURAL IMPERIALISM AT THE W.H.O. ?     http://tierneylab.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/28/cultural-imperialism-at-the-who/

FREE ONLINE BOOK:  “FEMALE CIRCUMCISION IN AFRICA:  CULTURE, CONTROVERSY, AND CHANGE”:

http://www.questia.com/library/book/female-circumcision-in-africa-culture-controversy-and-change-by-ylva-hernlund-bettina-shell-duncan.jsp

SHORT STORY ONLINE (“CUT” BY MAGEN LINDHOLM) ON FGM/C  (WARNING, SOME PARTS OF THIS STORY MAY DISTRUB READERS):

 http://www.asimovs.com/Nebulas03/cut.shtml

OUSMENE SEMBENE’S  “MOOLADE”,  A REVIEW:

http://www.qantara.de/webcom/show_article.php/_c-310/_nr-179/i.html

_________________________________________________________________________

FROM THE ARCHIVES:

W.H.O. URGES CIRCUMCISION TO REDUCE  SPREAD OF AIDS:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/29/health/29hiv.html?_r=1&oref=slogin 

**************************************************************************************************

Among the commentors at this article, there were two women who offered a very important and respectful opinion on this topic, Dr. Fuambai Ahmadu, Ph. D. ( a Sierra Leone woman of the Bondo tribe who had had the FC procedure done and was happy with it, and author of the article:  “Rites and Wrongs:   An Insider/Outsider Reflects on Power and Excision [2000]), and Hannah, (another Sierra Leone woman who had the procedure done to her and her anger at this procedure being forced on her as a child). Their comments gave a much needed perspective from a group of women who are often left out of this discussion of FC————mainly the women who are most affected by it, the women of East Africa and the Middle East, where the many types of FC are done.

Here is my response to them:

58.
#50, ” Fuambai Ahmadu:“The way I see it, women on both sides associate the clitoris with the phallus or male penis, however where uncircumcised western women see its presence as empowering and symbolic of women’s sexual freedom and autonomy, circumcised women see its removal as empowering and symbolic of women’s sexual and reproductive power as wives and mothers (stressing the socio-cultural importance of their interconnections with men).”

As a Western-born/raised American woman, I have never looked upon the clitoris as a dimunitive “phallus/male penis”. To me, my clitoris is a part of being a female—what I was born. But, not being born and raised in FC African societies, I could not see living without my clitoris since I am used to having it attached to my body. African women in FC societies clearly cannot see having their clitoris attached to their bodies, because of their centuries-old cultural beliefs.

I understand that among many FGM-practicing societies in Africa, you are not a mature woman if you have not undergone FGM—in essence, you are still a child, not to be taken seriously, immature. Clearly this is a practice which has gone on for thousands of years, and debates will continue in reference to it, whehther from the Western side, or, from the African side of the socieites that continue to practice female circumcision.

#50:

“So, then, why are circumcised African women singled out? What is so strange or (excuse me, exotic) about our genitals and sexuality that makes them so much more sacred and precious that even a mere pricking of our clitoris constitutes “mutilation” while others can pierce holes and hang earrings onto theirs with impunity?”

That is an interesting question.

As a black American woman, here is my take on that question.

My black African ancestors were brought to America forcibly via the TransAtlantic Slave Trade. Before black African women were brought to this hemisphere, our black female ancestors were raped in slave holding pens on the Slave Coast, were raped after being put on slave ships, were raped on slave plantations, were raped during Reconstruction, after Reconstruction—during segregation—-all the way up to the 1970s in the America South.

Black American women were NEVER considered women (and still pretty much are not, even today).

You may ask: “Why am I bringing up slavery/segregation rapes of black African/black American women?”

Because many of my black ancestors traditions/cultural initiation rites were debased and obliterated by the cruelty of slavery.

African ancestors (Fulani, Ibo, Yoruba, Hausa, Wolof) who were MINE, traditions that were MINE, gone because of white Europeans hatred of African people’s blackness—African people’s DIFFERENCE.

As a black American woman, I will never know any of the cultural/traditional rites of ceremony that my black West African ancestors had in West Africa because of Europe’s rapacious tearing away of my ancient female ancestor’s tribal restraints.

I am not saying that FC is right for me. Afterall, I am an American, and as I stated, I am used to my clitoris, etc.

But, I look at the women in Africa, and I speak what I have known all my life:

“At least THEY still have their cultural traditions. At least they still have what they have practiced for thousands of years. Their customs may seem repellant to Americans, their customs may seem repellant even to some present-day Africans———-but, DAMMIT!—they still have intact what was theirs.”

I am not in anyway saying that I wish to undergo FC. I am not saying that thousands of year-old traditions should just all of a sudden be destroyed without everyone on both sides of the issue listening to, speaking to, and understanding what the concerns are of FC.

I have read of the conditions under which FC is done. I understand that many girls (and women) do so want to be a part of their respective socities that still practice FC.

And that is what many of them want: to belong, to be a part of the community, to be a part of a long tradition, to be a girl who has “arrived” and is now a woman.

I will be honest, I do not believe in FC. I do not see where the clitoris/vagina is “dirty, foul, ugly”, but, I was born in America, and cannot help thinking that way. On the other hand, the women of FC societies were born in their respective socities and they cannot see having a clitoris as making them more accepted by their societies, so to them, a clitoris/vagina will be an “abberation” something to be removed, so they can become a woman, become a member of the community.

There have been tines when I have cried so much at all the many African traditions that have beaten, raped, burned, torn and destroyed from my black ancestors by white men (and women) via slavery/segregation.

But, even then, there is still so much that still survived that hated time of slavery, still so much that white hatred and white supremacy could not annihilate, much that still survives even today in 2008 America, among black Americans:

-Communual family/neighborhood connections (black mothers/grandmothers/fathers/uncles still live with their immediate families)
-Egalitarian relationships between black men and women concerning work (something that was unheard among whites after slavery)
-The black communities’s solidarity and cohesiveness in looking out for each other, our surviving a country that has sought so vehemently our destruction
-Food traditions (cultivating of rice in West Africa; just so everyone will know, it was BLACK AFRICAN WOMEN who brought the knowledge of cultivating, and cooking rice to America, not anyone else)
-Language traditions (Gullah, spoken by some black Americans in the South)
-Fabric weaving, unique forms of quilt work (the women of Gees Bend, Alabama)

Even though so much was torn from us (whatever our female rites of tradition may have been) we still clung on, held on, and would not let white supremacy/hatred destroy all in us. Even though so much was taken we still found a way to make a way with the very little that was left us.

But, I still wonder what traditions would I and my many black sisters (and brothers) be practicing in America if we were allowed to keep our traditions, our humanity…our personhood? If we black women were allowed to be and treated as what we were (and are): WOMEN

I wonder at what could have been.

I know that there would have been good (depending on one’s perspective) and bad (depending on one’s perspective) of aspects of West African ancient practices that many would have found questionable back then from the views of outsiders. (God knows, European whites certainly considered ALL Africans they met as less than human, and in many ways, still do). But, because I am a black American woman I prefer to listen and learn from all sides of various African women as to what THEY feel and think of FC, since it is a part of their tradition, and it affects them the most.

Female circumcision.

I do not belive in it, and that is my opinion.

Many women in Africa still do believe in it. That is their decision.

I am not saying that black American women should take up FC, but, African women still have their traditions, even though I do not consider the female anatomy as wrong, I do not consider what you were born with as something to be removed, else why were you born with it in the first place?

Fuambai and Hannah, what I am trying to say, is that you have your traditions and as you both show there is always two sides to a discussion.

No.

Better than that…………..

………….there are three sides to a story:

Yours (Fuambai)

Yours (Hannah)

And mine (Ann)

Peace.

— Posted by Ann

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

RELATED LINKS:

http://salem-news.com/articles/january312008/circ_paris_13108.php

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

CONGO FACTIONS VOW PEACE AFTER CEASEFIRE VIOLATIONS

Published: January 29, 2008
Filed at 9:26 a.m. ET

 Reuters

KINSHASA (Reuters) – Congolese Tutsi rebels and a rival Mai Mai militia group pledged on Tuesday to respect a recently-signed peace accord, a day after clashes between their fighters broke the ceasefire.

Early on Monday, fighting broke out around two villages in Democratic Republic of Congo’s east North Kivu province between rebels loyal to renegade General Laurent Nkunda and the Pareco Mai Mai faction. Both sides blamed each other for attacking.

The clashes near Lusirandaka and Kasake, around 70 km (44 miles) west of Goma, raised fears of a breakdown of a ceasefire and peace deal signed last week by Congo’s government with 25 armed groups, including Nkunda’s rebels and the Pareco faction.

But spokesmen for Nkunda and the Pareco group said they would stand by the peace accord, which aims to end years of conflict that has raged on in Congo’s turbulent east despite the formal end of a wider 1998-2003 war in the country.

Continued fighting has added to a humanitarian catastrophe that has caused more deaths — 5.4 million since 1998 — than any other conflict since World War Two, relief experts say.

“This does not endanger our commitment, but the violations of the ceasefire by Pareco worry us,” Seraphin Mirindi, a military spokesman for Nkunda, told Reuters. The area where Monday’s clashes took place was calm on Tuesday.

“We signed and we respect what we signed. We will not pull out of the process,” said Pareco spokesman Theophile Museveni.

The United Nations mission in Congo, whose peacekeepers are setting up buffer zones in North Kivu as part of the ceasefire deal, said it was cautiously optimistic the peace accord could be successfully implemented despite Monday’s violence.

“The deal has been signed only recently. In an area with difficult terrain, with a large number of heavily armed people who don’t necessarily love each other, there is bound to be friction,” U.N. mission spokesman Kemal Saiki said.

“I don’t think trust will be established overnight, and for a ceasefire to work, you need a modicum of trust,” he added.

Nkunda’s spokesman Mirindi said the Congolese army was respecting the ceasefire in North Kivu, where fighting over the last year between government forces, Nkunda’s rebels and Mai Mai militia has driven 400,000 civilians from their homes.

President Joseph Kabila, who won elections last year in the vast, former Belgian colony, has vowed to pacify the east.

Although Wednesday’s accord raised peace hopes, analysts warned its implementation, including the creation of a military commission to monitor the ceasefire and an amnesty to be offered to rebel and militia fighters, could still create problems.

(Editing by Pascal Fletcher and Matthew Jones)

(Article courtesy of The New York Times:  http://www.nytimes.com )

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

OPPOSITION POLITICIAN IS KILLED IN KENYA

Jon Hrusa/European Pressphoto Agency

Opposition supporters, some armed with machetes, clubs and axes, were scattered by Kenyan paramilitary police in the Kibera slum in Nairobi.

Published: January 30, 2008
NAIROBI, Kenya — Melitus Mugabe Were, a freshman parliamentarian, could have been one of the keys to unlocking Kenya’s crisis but on Tuesday he was shot dead in his driveway.Mr. Were, 39, was an opposition politician who had resisted his party’s often belligerent talk. He had married a woman of another ethnic group, built a footbridge in a slum with his own money and sponsored teenage mothers to go to college. As Kenya slid into chaos this past month after a disputed election, he shuttled between leaders of different ethnic groups and was actually organizing a peace march the night before he died.

“Whoever did this,” said Elizabeth Mwangi, a friend, “has killed the dreams of many.”

Noor Khamis/Reuters

Opposition supporters display a poster of Mugabe Were, a Kenyan opposition politician who was killed at his home early Tuesday. More Photos »

The details of his death are still sketchy, but the killing appears not to have been a robbery but an intended hit.

The news of his killing spread fast and violently, with opposition supporters rioting across Nairobi, the capital, intensifying the clashes of the past weeks.

In the widespread troubles that have erupted in the country since the election in December, Kenyans are now literally ripping their country apart, uprooting miles of railroad tracks, chopping down telephone poles, burning government offices and looting schools.

Militias from opposing ethnic groups are battling in several towns and Kenyan army helicopters fired rubber bullets at crowds on Tuesday to disperse them. There have been reports of forced circumcisions and beheadings.

The economy is paralyzed, more than 800 people have been killed and many Kenyans fear their country is tumbling toward disaster.

According to Mr. Were’s guard and family members, he had just pulled up to his gate around midnight and was waiting in his Mercedes for the gate to open when another car drew alongside him.

“I heard a beep,” said Mr. Were’s wife, Agnes. “And then two loud shots. I ran out and saw my husband bleeding and people were yelling to me, “He’s still breathing, he’s still breathing.” But when I got him to the hospital, he was dead.”

Mr. Were, whose campaign posters show him smiling with street children, had been shot in the heart and in the eye.

His guard said two men dragged him out of the car, shot him and drove off, without taking a thing. Family members said he had been followed by suspicious cars several weeks before.

Opposition supporters immediately deemed the killing a political assassination, intended to intimidate Kenya’s opposition movement, which is challenging the election in December that Kenya’s president, Mwai Kibaki, narrowly won. Police officials say they are investigating the death closely and are ruling nothing out.

A huge crowd formed in front of Mr. Were’s ranch house on Tuesday morning and built roadblocks of burning tires and heavy stones. It was the first time that rioters had reached an affluent neighborhood in Nairobi, and it was not just rowdy unemployed youth from the slums who were taking part. Bespectacled men in suits lit fires in the street.

“This is how we express our outrage,” explained Evans Muremi, a social worker, who stacked burning tires while wearing a jacket and tie.

Kenya has long been a violent place. Mob justice was a feature of life here even before the disputed vote, with crowds routinely stoning to death suspected robbers. The same is true for ethnic tensions, which have always existed in Kenya but have never exploded as widely as they have in the past weeks.

Most of the deaths in the past month have been the result of ethnically driven clashes, which seem to be provoking a spiraling cycle of revenge.

The crisis is also laying bare the shortcomings of Kenya’s poorly-paid security forces, who often respond either too harshly or too feebly. Nearly two weeks ago, they shot an unarmed demonstrator at point-blank range in front of rolling TV cameras. On Tuesday, they drove past a crowd of young men pulling down a telephone pole in front of Mr. Were’s house and did nothing.

There is also a crisis of leadership. Kenya’s top politicians are arguing about who is to blame for the violence more than they are working together to stop it.

Mr. Kibaki, who was considered aloof even before the election, has made few public appearances since his country began to unravel.

On Tuesday, Mr. Kibaki was scheduled to begin formal negotiations with his rival, Raila Odinga, the top opposition leader, who says the elections were rigged.

Kofi Annan, the former United Nations secretary general, has been in Kenya for a week trying to bring the two sides together. So far, neither has budged.

Both Mr. Kibaki and Mr. Odinga claim to have won the election, and Mr. Odinga is demanding a re-run. Mr. Kibaki has refused, and despite talk of a power-sharing arrangement Mr. Kibaki has already moved ahead and given the most important cabinet positions to political allies.

UPDATED LINK:  http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/30/world/africa/30kenya.html?hp

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

WHO’S BLACK AND FEMALE AND HOW DO THEY VOTE?

Published: January 29, 2008
In the Democratic presidential primary next Tuesday, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton appears to have an advantage in New York City: Among enrolled Democrats, women outnumber men by about half a million, or 50 percent.But New York’s political calculus can be more complicated than that. Some of the biggest gender gaps in enrollment are in Congressional districts with largely black populations.

“It’s not just gender,” said Lee M. Miringoff, director of the Marist College Institute for Public Opinion. Young women as well as black women “will be voting for Barack Obama,” he said.

In New York, though, black women generally account for a smaller share of the Democratic primary electorate than they did Saturday in South Carolina, where they helped propel Senator Obama to a landslide victory.

And in New York, because Mr. Obama focused on fielding full delegate slates in all 29 Congressional districts — a mission his supporters accomplished — his campaign had less time to register young people and blacks, who have voted for him disproportionately in earlier primaries.

In marked contrast to 1984 and 1988, when Jesse Jackson’s supporters enrolled some 150,000 new voters before the New York presidential primary, fewer than 30,000 have been added to the rolls in New York City since Nov. 1.

Of the 5.3 million Democrats eligible to vote in New York State next Tuesday, about 2.6 million live in the city. Of those, more than 1 million are men and 1.5 million are women, a much wider gender gap than exists elsewhere in the state.

In New York, some black women said they found the historic circumstances of this year’s Democratic primary campaign to be liberating.

“I’m freed from having to make my choice along gender or racial lines,” said Binta Brown, a Manhattan lawyer and Clinton supporter. “It allows me, and a lot of other women, to look at who these people are and what they

have to offer this country. To me, it’s a no-brainer.”

Joyce Johnson, the state field director of the Obama campaign, acknowledged that some black women feel pulled in both directions. “Hillary is the woman in front of us who has a chance,” she said, “but beyond race and gender, there is something that has captured this country, and that something is Barack Obama.”

A statewide WNBC/Marist Poll released last week showed Mrs. Clinton leading among all likely voters, 48 percent to 32 percent. She was ahead among all women, 51 percent to 31 percent.

Mr. Obama was leading among black likely voters, though, 67 percent to 26 percent, and among black women by a smaller but still commanding margin, 57 percent to 31 percent. And 12 percent of black women said they were still undecided, a higher proportion than among most other groups.

Sex and race are by no means unambiguous predictors of whom New Yorkers will support, although in a number of early primaries women have voted by lopsided margins for Mrs. Clinton and blacks for Mr. Obama.

A test of how black women reconcile divided loyalties came Saturday in South Carolina, where black women made up 35 percent of the voters. Mr. Obama received the support of 78 percent of black women, compared with 80 percent of black men, according to exit polls conducted by Edison/Mitofsky for the National Election Pool of television networks and The Associated Press.

Mrs. Clinton was supported by about 3 in 10 women over all, the South Carolina exit polls indicated, including 4 in 10 white women and 2 in 10 black women. In the New Hampshire primary, where the vast majority of voters are white, Mrs. Clinton won 46 percent of female voters and Mr. Obama 34.

In New York’s 2004 presidential primary, according to surveys of voters leaving the polls, women constituted 57 percent of the statewide vote. Black and Hispanic women (Mrs. Clinton has been running ahead among Hispanic voters in early primaries) together made up about 19 percent. The gender gap also exists in a number of predominantly Hispanic Congressional districts.

“In a Democratic primary, she definitely has an edge because she’s a woman,” said Jerry Skurnick, whose company, Prime New York, analyzes voting patterns.

John H. Mollenkopf, executive director of the Center for Urban Research at the City University of New York Graduate Center, said that generally, the enrollment figures should favor Mrs. Clinton, particularly in her home state.

“All other things held constant, the gender differential in registration should help Senator Clinton,” he said. “It will be very interesting to see what African-American women voters do. My guess is that women voters will be less likely to vote for him than men, and older women less likely than younger women.”

Assemblyman Hakeem Jeffries of Brooklyn, who is supporting Senator Obama, said, “African-American women have reason to be proud of both Senator Obama’s candidacy and Senator Clinton’s, and at the end of the day their decision will be based on which candidate speaks most profoundly to the issues they care most about.”

Ann Lewis, a senior adviser to Mrs. Clinton, said, “We would never assume that women voters vote on the basis of gender alone,” but suggested that her candidate might benefit from the nation’s rising concerns about the economy.

“Historically, women are more vulnerable and they’re the budget-keepers, and this is an issue that Hillary has been stepping out on,” she said.

Minyon Moore, another Clinton senior adviser, said her candidate had a record of raising issues like “health care, elderly parents, making sure your children have safe environments” and saw women “as parents, caretakers and sometimes as single providers for households.”

“You’d be torn if you were voting based on race or gender, but if you were voting on who could move this country forward, there is no contest,” Miss Moore said. She added, though, that since a woman and a black candidate are leading in the polling, black women, in particular, are in an enviable position in making their choice.

“We don’t have to be against anybody,” she said.

But Mr. Obama, who was endorsed over the weekend by Caroline Kennedy, the daughter of the former president, has been working hard to claim a special understanding of female voters. In South Carolina last week, as he courted women, black and white, Mr. Obama said: “I’ll be honest with you. Women are carrying a bigger load. The reason I know this? I was raised by a single mom.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

FROM THE ARCHIVES: AIDS FEARS GROW FOR BLACK WOMEN

Published: April 5, 2004
Once a week, the five friends, all members of the Abundant Life Cathedral here, get together to eat sushi, sip wine and talk. But one recent afternoon, the women chose a different activity: They went to see ”Not a Day Goes By,” a musical about black men on the ”down low” who, while not calling themselves gay or bisexual, have sex with other men, often behind the backs of their wives and girlfriends.To these women, it was a subject of increasing urgency.

”Once I found out how prevalent the down low was in our community, I was very afraid,” said one of the women, Tracy Scott, a 37-year-old government relations consultant.

Her friend Misha King, 35, said she needed to get as much information as she could, as quickly as she could.

”I’ve been on field trips to the gay bars and have seen guys that look like men you would date,” Ms. King said. ”I treat every man as a bisexual because I don’t want to end up as the sister with H.I.V.”

In the past, concern about black women and AIDS was mainly focused on those who had used drugs or had had sex with users. But increasingly, women like Ms. Scott and her friends have begun to worry, too.

In government studies of 29 states, a black woman was 23 times more likely to be infected with AIDS than was a white woman, and black women accounted for 71.8 percent of new H.I.V. cases in women from 1999 to 2002. Though new cases of H.I.V. among black women have been stable in the past few years, the number of those who have been infected through heterosexual sex has risen.

In 2001, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonprofit group focusing on health issues, an estimated 67 percent of black women with AIDS contracted the virus through heterosexual sex, compared with 58 percent four years earlier. Black women accounted for half of all H.I.V. infections acquired through heterosexual sex, in men or women, from 1999 to 2002, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said.

Though heterosexual transmission has risen for all women, researchers say a black woman has a greater chance of coming into contact with the virus when she has sex with another black person because, compared with the general population, there is a higher rate of H.I.V. among black Americans.

Recent studies suggest that 30 percent of all black bisexual men may be infected with H.I.V., and up to 90 percent of those men do not know they are infected. Researchers for the Centers for Disease Control have referred to these men as a ”bridge” to infection from gay men to heterosexual women.

In February, health officials identified a fast-spreading outbreak of infections among 84 men, primarily black students at 37 colleges in North Carolina. The majority were infected through sex with other men, but a third reported that they had had sex with men and women.

”What we learned from the research we did with college men here is the potential for H.I.V. to enter the mainstream population of the black community,” said Dr. Peter Leone, medical director of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services H.I.V. prevention unit and a co-author of a study of the 84 men.

”This is a big change and may be a defining moment,” Dr. Leone added. ”I don’t mean to sound like Chicken Little, but if we don’t react to this very quickly and aggressively, it’ll be like the 80’s all over again. Instead of gay white men, though, we’ll be dealing with large numbers of young black men and their female partners.”

The fear of H.I.V. among blacks is not new, and the down low has been part of the black lexicon at least since the mid-1990’s, when E. Lynn Harris’s novels about bisexual black men who lead double lives first appeared on best-seller lists.

AIDS prevention efforts have generally focused on drug users and men who have sex with men. But the North Carolina findings made it clear that H.I.V. had the potential to spread to a wider circle of blacks. In particular, the new research has alarmed black women. Now in online chat rooms, at book clubs, on radio call-in shows and in whispered conversations with friends, many are trying to piece together information to figure out if men, whether one-night stands or their husbands, may have secret lives putting them at risk.

”H.I.V./AIDS is a disease of opportunity, not socioeconomics,” said Phill Wilson, executive director of the Black AIDS Institute in Los Angeles. ”The research out of North Carolina reveals that among black folks, no matter who you are or who you think you are, you are not safe from H.I.V.”

Dr. Robert S. Janssen, director of the Centers for Disease Control’s divisions of H.I.V./AIDS prevention, warned that evidence was lacking about what was driving infection in black women.

”Yes, the risk of contracting H.I.V. is highest in the African-American community and there’s no question black women are at higher risk compared to other women, but there’s still a lot we don’t understand,” Dr. Janssen said.

”However, we are concerned enough to tell women of all socioeconomic groups to ask their partners about their sero status and if they are having sex with men,” he said, referring to H.I.V. status.

A tangle of factors heightens the risk for black women.

No one knows for sure how much the spread of the AIDS virus among blacks can be attributed to the behavior of bisexual men. Some reports have suggested that black men are more likely to keep their bisexuality a secret for a variety of reasons, but that, too, is hard to quantify.

Still, researchers say it comes down to a numbers game: blacks make up roughly 12 percent of the nation’s population but in 2002 accounted for 42 percent of people living with AIDS and more than half of all new infections. Blacks tend to have sexual relations with other blacks, experts say, which works to confine the virus within the African-American ”sexual network.”

”A high prevalence of infection in the pool of potential partners can spread sexually transmitted infections rapidly within the ethnic group and keep it there,” said Dr. Adaora A. Adimora, an infectious disease physician and associate professor at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine in Chapel Hill.

She and others cite several other factors. Perhaps the most vexing may be the shortage of black men as potential partners. This gender gap, experts say, may lead black women to make unsafe sexual decisions and raise their risk of infection.

”Large numbers of black men are in prison, or unemployed, or dead, so there is simply a smaller pool of available partners to choose from,” said Dr. Gail E. Wyatt, a psychiatry professor and an associate director of the University of California, Los Angeles, AIDS Institute. ”So while women are quite concerned about being infected with H.I.V., the threat of death is not enough to persuade black women to protect themselves if it means being alone, childless and with less income.”

Though women outnumber men in the general population, the gap is wider among blacks. According to 2002 census data, there are 12.6 million black women 21 or older, compared with 9.9 million black men. On college campuses, the numbers are particularly lopsided: in 2000, according to the National Center for Education Statistics, more than one million black women were enrolled in degree-granting institutions, compared with 635,000 black men.

”Many of the women on campus are panic-stricken because of the feeling of scarcity,” said Dr. Beverly Guy-Sheftall, professor of women’s studies and English at Spelman College in Atlanta. ”This shortage of desirable partners creates a sense of desperation. I see a lot of problematic sexual decision-making among black women across class and age lines.”

The shortage of available black men can contribute to the spread of H.I.V. in other ways.

”Because of the lack of marriageable black men, marriage rates have dropped among African-Americans,” said Dr. Edward O. Laumann, a professor of sociology at the University of Chicago and an editor of the new book ”The Sexual Organization of the City.” In 2002, according to the census, 37.7 percent of black men 15 or older were married and living with their spouses, compared with 58.5 percent of white men. Among women 15 or older, 29.2 percent of blacks were married and living with their spouses, compared with 54.3 percent of whites.

”When marriage rates are low, there is a higher likelihood of concurrence — the pattern of having more than one partner at the same time,” Dr. Laumann said. ”The less educated and the higher educated are more likely to be in these kinds of fragile relationships, which can facilitate the spread of sexually transmitted diseases.”

Dr. Adimora said the research did not suggest greater promiscuity among blacks. ”No one is saying that black people don’t care about long-term, stable relationships,” she said. ”But the lower number of economically viable black men destabilizes marriage and long-term partnering. One pattern is the man who has sex with one girlfriend, goes back to a previous girlfriend and then returns to the new one. This kind of pattern can increase H.I.V. spread.”

Vanessa Johnson said she wished she had been more careful a decade ago. She did not learn that her boyfriend and the father of her son was bisexual until he contracted an AIDS-related illness. She learned she had H.I.V. in 1990, right after she graduated from law school.

”I understood that there was a possibility he was seeing other people, but I was willing to overlook it,” said Ms. Johnson, now 46, who is deputy director of the Capital District African American Coalition on AIDS in Albany.

Ms. Johnson said that she forgave her boyfriend, who died in 1994.

”His infection most likely came from having sex with another man,” she said, ”but he was afraid to say that.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

FROM THE ARCHIVES: 36 YEARS AFTER TITLE IX

Sports of The Times

Published: April 9, 2007
I stood in front of the associate professor Barbara Osborne’s Sports Law class at the University of North Carolina last Wednesday. The subject was the seldom talked-about disparity of power and privilege between black and white women in the sports industry.The timing was fitting. This year is the 35th anniversary of Title IX, the Congressional legislation that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in any educational program that receives federal financial assistance.A week earlier, hundreds attended a convention in Cleveland, the site of the women’s basketball Final Four, to celebrate and discuss Title IX, the law that changed the landscape of sports in America. Title IX drastically increased the number of women involved in intercollegiate athletics as well as the amount of money spent to support them, including scholarships, facilities, coaches and publicity.

After her class, Osborne noted how few of her students, especially the women, had any idea about the struggle that was fought to elevate women’s sports to their current level.

Many of them, she said, felt that things had always been the way they are now. So many of today’s women have had life and opportunity handed to them on a platter. Osborne said: “They have it so good here. Then they go out in the real world and get slapped in the face by reality.”

It didn’t take long for Osborne’s students to receive a hard dose of reality. On the day I was speaking in Chapel Hill, Don Imus, the national radio host, referred to the women on the Rutgers basketball team as “nappy-headed ho’s.” The remarks were part of off-handed comments about the N.C.A.A. championship game the night before between Rutgers and Tennessee.

For all the ugliness of the remarks, I’m encouraged by the controversy they’ve unleashed. So many of our young people, especially women, especially African-American women, have been raised in cocoons, led to believe that sexism and racism have significantly subsided. This naïveté is so entrenched that the threshold to insult has become higher.

There have been calls for Imus to be fired. (Full disclosure: After I wrote a column critical of Imus in 1999, I was told that he referred to me as a “quota hire.” Since then, he has apparently praised my work, even if he has declined to review my books.) But there are larger issues, and chief among them is how to close the historic and deeply rooted gap of consciousness and compassion between black and white women.

Historically, white feminists, and black men, have drawn a counterproductive line in respect to African-American women — a line that has compromised the war on sexism and racism. The author Paula Giddings wrote, “We have been perceived as token women in black texts and token blacks in feminist texts.”

Imus’s comments highlighted age-old, deep-rooted stereotypes that seem to surface whenever African-American women excel in sport.

Beginning in the mid-1930s, when African-American women began to excel in track and field, their success was seen through a mainstream prism of success in a “mannish” sport and reinforced disparaging stereotypes.

In the late 1940s, an Olympic official, Norman Cox, sarcastically proposed that in the case of black women, “The International Olympic Committee should create a special category of competition for them — the unfairly advantaged ‘hermaphrodites’ who regularly defeated ‘normal women,’ those less skilled ‘child bearing’ types with ‘largish breasts, wide hips and knocked knees.’ ”

Linda Greene, a law professor at the University of Wisconsin and a founding member of the Black Women in Sports Foundation, said that Imus’s characterization of the Rutgers team resurrected “old stereotypes about African-American women that date from slavery, where stereotypes of promiscuity were generated to mask the systematic rape that was a concomitant of slavery.”

“In addition,” she said, “they also are consistent with the historical rejection of black women as beneficiaries of the feminine ideal.” Althea Gibson, the first African-American to win a major tennis championship, introduced an aggressive, take-no-prisoners style of tennis. Time magazine reported in 1957 that Gibson was forced to take a test to see if she had an extra chromosome.

On the surface, Imus’s remarks were aimed at African-American women. But as Greene points out: “No woman who participates in sport, and no mother or father who encourages and supports that participation, can escape their animus. Beyond his bold and overt racism lie assumptions about the proper bounds of femininity, assumptions that Title IX and other civil rights legislation sought to shatter.”

According to N.C.A.A. statistics, 70 percent of the athletes benefiting from increased athletic opportunity are white. “A closer look sport by sport reveals more stunning disparities,” Greene said. Black women, she said, account for more than 35 percent of the basketball players and 20 percent of track and field competitors, yet are only 2.5 percent of all the intercollegiate soccer players and are virtually absent from other sports.

How will the current generation of young women with unprecedented access reconcile gender with race and class? Will it ever?

Whether a foul-mouth radio host stays or goes, the larger issue is that sexism and racism are very much alive.

E-mail: wcr@nytimes.com

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

COLD CASE: CHERYL POLK

YOUNG MOM’S TRIP FOR BREAD ENDED IN MURDER

Monday, January 28, 2008

By Jeff McShan / 11 News This cold case dates back to 1984. It was the month President Ronald Reagan was shot, Walter Cronkite signed off of CBS, and the Houston Rockets were having a dream season that would eventually lead them to the NBA Finals versus the Boston Celtics.It was also a time when a young mother of two was murdered in southeast Houston. Her name was Cheryl Polk.

“Cheryl Polk was 23 years old,” HPD Sgt. Eric Mehl said. “She left her home, which was in the 5600 block of Royal Palms, which is about 8 miles from where we are standing right now.”

Sgt. Mehl said she left her home in a 1977 Chrysler New Yorker. She’d planned to go to a nearby grocery store to pick up a loaf of bread.

“And then next thing anybody knows, her body was found here in the 6300 block of Madden Street,” Sgt. Mehl said.

A passing motorist found her. She’d been shot twice.

“Initially that person was afraid to stop because it is so desolate, so dark, they thought they were possibly being set up to be robbed, so they continued on,” Sgt. Mehl said.

But the person turned around a few minutes later and called police.

“Whoever killed her and stole the car also stole several items from inside the car, including a tool box, various tools and there was a bottle of wild country cologne taken as well,” Sgt. Mehl said. He said they’d talked with Polk’s then-boyfriend, and he’d given them a list of everything that was stolen.

Her car was found four days later near MLK and the Loop.

Twenty-seven years after the murder, the street, not too far from Hobby Airport, remains desolate.

Except for an occasional train, it is extremely quiet out here. But Sgt. Mehl is hoping the killer hasn’t been able to keep quiet. Perhaps he told someone about what happened.

And just perhaps, someone knows something about this cold case murder in March 1981.

*****************************************************************************************************

http://www.khou.com/topstories/stories/khou080128_ac_coldcase1984.68c97de5.html

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

AUTHOR TONI MORRISON ENDORSES BARACK OBAMA

Toni Morrison talks during the 58th National Book Awards in New York, in this Nov. 14, 2007, file photo.  Morrison has endorsed Democratic presidential hopeful, Sen. Barack Obama, for what she said are his gifts. 'In addition to keen intelligence, integrity and a rare authenticity, you exhibit something that has nothing to do with age, experience, race or gender and something I don't see in other candidates,' Morrison wrote to Obama. 'That something is a creative imagination which coupled with brilliance equals wisdom.'  (AP Photo/Seth Wenig, file)

AP Photo: Toni Morrison talks during the 58th National Book Awards in New York, in this November 14, 2007 file photo. Morrison has endorsed presidential hopeful, Sen. Barack Obama, for what she said are his gifts:   “In addition to keen intelligence, integrity and a rare authenticity, you exhibit something that has nothing to do with age, experience, race or gender and something I don’t see in other candidates,” Morrison wrote. “That something is a creative imagination which coupled with brilliance equals wisdom. It is too bad if we associate it only with gray hair and old age. Or if we call searing vision naivete. Or if we believe cunning is insight. Or if we settle for finessing cures tailored for each ravaged tree in the forest while ignoring the poisonous landscape that feeds and surrounds it.”Wisdom is a gift; you can’t train for it, inherit it, learn it in a class, or earn it in the workplace — that access can foster the acquisition of knowledge, but not wisdom,” Morrison wrote.
Published: January 28, 2008
Filed at 2:37 p.m. ETWASHINGTON (AP) — The woman who famously labeled Bill Clinton as the ”first black president” is backing Barack Obama to be the second.

Author Toni Morrison said her endorsement of the Democratic presidential candidate has little to do with Obama’s race — he is the son of a black father from Kenya and a white mother from Kansas — but rather his personal gifts.

Writing with the touch of a poet in a letter to the Illinois senator, Morrison explained why she chose Obama over Hillary Rodham Clinton for her first public presidential endorsement.

Morrison, whose acclaimed novels usually concentrate on the lives of black women, said she has admired Clinton for years because of her knowledge and mastery of politics, but then dismissed that experience in favor of Obama’s vision.

”In addition to keen intelligence, integrity and a rare authenticity, you exhibit something that has nothing to do with age, experience, race or gender and something I don’t see in other candidates,” Morrison wrote. ”That something is a creative imagination which coupled with brilliance equals wisdom. It is too bad if we associate it only with gray hair and old age. Or if we call searing vision naivete. Or if we believe cunning is insight. Or if we settle for finessing cures tailored for each ravaged tree in the forest while ignoring the poisonous landscape that feeds and surrounds it.

”Wisdom is a gift; you can’t train for it, inherit it, learn it in a class, or earn it in the workplace — that access can foster the acquisition of knowledge, but not wisdom,” Morrison wrote.

In 1998, Morrison wrote a column for the New Yorker magazine in which she wrote of Bill Clinton: ”White skin notwithstanding, this is our first black president. Blacker than any actual black person who could ever be elected in our children’s lifetime. After all, Clinton displays almost every trope of blackness: single-parent household, born poor, working-class, saxophone-playing, McDonald’s-and-junk-food-loving boy from Arkansas.”

Obama responded to Morrison’s endorsement with a written statement: ”Toni Morrison has touched a nation with the grace and beauty of her words, and I was deeply moved and honored by the letter she wrote and the support she is giving our campaign.”

(Hattip to Rachel of Rachel’s Tavern:  http://www.rachelstavern.com )

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized