Monthly Archives: January 2008

GENARLOW WILSON TO ATTEND MOREHOUSE COLLEGE

January 10, 2008


Genarlow Wilson: ‘Waiting’ for Morehouse College


The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
 

January 10, 2008

 With prison behind him, Genarlow Wilson says he is ready for college.Wilson, the Douglasville teen who spent two years in prison for having consensual sex with a teenager, will attend Atlanta’s Morehouse College beginning next week, courtesy of the Tom Joyner Foundation, an educational non-profit founded by the nationally syndicated radio personality.

File photo
Genarlow Wilson
 
RELATED:
Video: Genarlow Wilson to attend Morehouse

“I’ve been wanting to go college for so long,” Wilson, 21, told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution after Thursday’s announcement on Joyner’s show. “It was very generous for [Joyner] to do that for me. I can’t say enough to express my gratitude. I won’t let him down.”

This weekend, Wilson plans to move into an upperclassman dorm at the historically black men’s college. He begins life as a part-time student — taking freshman reading, freshman math and an English course — Wednesday. He plans to become a full-time student in the summer or fall.

Joyner’s 10-year-old foundation is paying for Wilson’s tuition, books and on-campus housing. The amount of the scholarship was not made public.

“I am more than ready for it,” said Wilson, 21. “The 16th can’t come soon enough.”

The one-time Douglasville High School football star also plans to play football at Morehouse.

“But right now that isn’t my main priority,” said Wilson, who has played several positions but prefers defensive back. “I’m more focused on my studies right now.”

Wilson was freed from prison Oct. 26 after the Georgia Supreme Court ruled that his 10-year sentence for having consensual oral sex with a 15-year-old girl was “cruel and unusual punishment.”

Wilson, who was 17 at the time of the incident, was convicted of felony aggravated child molestation. At the time, state law mandated a minimum 10-year sentence for the crime.

The Legislature eventually changed the law to make such cases a misdemeanor when they involved teenagers close in age.

Despite his ordeal, Wilson says he has no regrets.

“I’m not mad about anything that happened, really,” said Wilson, who now lives in Cobb County. “It helped me grow as a person, made me stronger, made me more ambitious.

“I was at my lowest point in life. Now everything I wanted to do can finally happen.”

RELATED LINKS:

http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/atlanta/stories/2008/01/10/genarlow_0110.html

http://search.cnn.com/search.jsp?query=GENARLOW%20WILSON&type=web&sortBy=date&intl=false1/10/genarlow_0110.html

TRACKBACK:

https://kathmanduk2.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/genarlow-wilson/

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

NIGERIAN MILITANTS INVITE GEORGE CLOONEY

Nigerian Militants Invite Clooney

AP Photo
George Clooney arrives at the National Board of Review of Motion Pictures awards gala in New York in this Jan. 15, 2008 file photo.

JANUARY 19, 2008
LAGOS, Nigeria -Militants in Nigeria’s restive oil region on Saturday invited actor and peace activist George Clooney to visit the area and asked for U.N. intervention in their conflict.

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon designated Clooney as a U.N. “messenger of peace” Friday to promote the world body’s activities, especially in its far-flung peacekeeping missions. The 46-year-old actor has been campaigning for an end to the 4 1/2-year war in Darfur and for humanitarian aid for the millions caught up in the conflict.

Nigeria’s Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta congratulated Clooney on his appointment and invited him to visit their impoverished region, which has been wracked by two years of fighting, bombings and kidnapping of foreign workers.

“Mr. Clooney, MEND extends an invitation to you to see things for yourself and is willing to work with you and other credible peace makers of international repute to stop Nigeria from plunging into the abyss of war,” the group said in a statement e-mailed to reporters.

It said the unrest in the region was building up to a crisis that would dwarf Darfur’s.

Clooney was not immediately available for comment.

The group asked for the United Nations to take a role _ which it did not specify _ in the conflict.

“We suggest that the U.N. should take a proactive step to nip the Niger Delta unrest in the bud before it is too late. Your role as a Messenger of Peace makes it imperative to consider the Niger Delta as a potential time bomb waiting to explode for which urgent steps must be taken.”

The call for foreign intervention was unusual, as the militant group has so far used Africa’s biggest oil industry as a leverage point to pressure Nigeria’s government to meet its demands.

Those include more oil revenue for the region, and the release from prison of some of the group’s top leaders. Attacks since early 2006 have cut Nigeria’s oil production by about one quarter, helping send oil prices to historic highs.

Nearly 200 foreign workers have been kidnapped in the region in the past two years; they normally are released unharmed after a ransom is paid.

The militants have offered a unilateral truce if one of their leaders is released from prison in Angola, where he is being held on arms-smuggling charges. The group said Saturday the man was sick and they asked for an international envoy to visit him in prison.

While many U.N. agencies have goodwill ambassadors to promote activities ranging from helping children and refugees to promoting human rights, “messengers of peace” are selected by the secretary-general to promote the broader work of the United Nations.

Clooney will receive his designation at U.N. headquarters Jan. 31.

http://realtime.com/realtime_news/rt_entertainment/18049387_nigerian_militants_invite_clooney____.html?bod=20070531&cver=1.1.2.76&original_pcode=RT11RPBR&pcode=RTG11RT&mode=dt_bottom&user-status=not-signed-in&pageregion=headline_area

RELATED LINKS:

http://www.nigeriavillagesquare.com/articles/nvs/blood-oil.html 

http://www.voanews.com/english/archive/2007-05/2007-05-08-voa20.cfm?CFID=188561875&CFTOKEN=76576687

http://www.nigeriavillagesquare.com/articles/guest-articles/mend-they-are-not-terrorists-but-freedom-fig.html

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

SOUTHERN BLACKS ARE SPLIT ON CLINTON VS. OBAMA

(Erik S. Lesser for The New York Times)

Representative Sanford D. Bishop Jr. is co-chairman of the Obama campaign in Georgia. His wife, Vivian Creighton Bishop, a city official in Columbus, Ga., favors Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Article Tools Sponsored By
Published: January 18, 2008
ATLANTA — The People’s Voice African-American Weekly News in tiny Roanoke, Ala., has not endorsed a candidate in the state’s Democratic presidential primary on Feb. 5 — much to the frustration of its publisher, Charlotte A. Clark-Frieson, a Barack Obama supporter.

Blog

The Caucus

The CaucusThe latest political news from around the nation. Join the discussion.

(Dana Mixer for The New York Times)

Mark Johnson, who backs Mrs. Clinton, was the first person to put up a sign in his neighborhood in Atlanta. He said his son reacted by asking, “Dad, what if they throw rocks at the window?”

“I’m trying to get ready to endorse him, but my board is so split,” Ms. Clark-Frieson said.

While letters to the paper are almost unanimously in favor of Mr. Obama, she said, the older of the state’s two black political organizations, the Alabama Democratic Conference, endorsed Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton in October.

So great is the tension over the Democratic contest, Ms. Clark-Frieson said, that many of her newspaper’s board members have refused to betray their preference even in private.

Across the South, a fierce competition is afoot for black voters, who are expected to constitute 20 percent to 50 percent of voters in the South Carolina Democratic primary on Jan. 26 and in the four Southern states with primaries on Feb. 5: Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia and Tennessee. In many counties, registration has spiked since Mr. Obama won the Iowa caucuses, and election officials say interest is at its highest point in several election cycles.

While the official ground game is just beginning, chatter about the two candidates — both of whom have substantial claims to African-American support — is constant on black radio shows and e-mail lists and at barbershops. Officials and ministers are coming forward with last-minute endorsements, and campaigns are buttering up the activity directors at centers for the elderly. Both campaigns have opened or will open offices this week — the Clinton camp in Nashville, the Obama camp in Little Rock, Ark., in Memphis and two each in Alabama and Georgia.

For several weeks, race has dominated the Democratic contest, prompting a flurry of angry words between the Obama and Clinton camps. That fight appears to have died down, but Southern black voters are still in knots over a contest that pits a woman they know well against a viable black candidate. If any election can prove that Southern blacks are not a monolithic voting bloc, it is this one.

The competition pits old loyalties against new passions, and traditional kingmakers — many of whom backed Mrs. Clinton months ago — against Mr. Obama’s grass-roots energy. And as the Clinton camp doggedly pursues women, in some cases it is splitting families, like Representative Sanford D. Bishop Jr., co-chairman of the Obama campaign in Georgia, and his wife, Vivian Creighton Bishop, a public official in Columbus, Ga., and a Clinton supporter.

In Atlanta, the race has also split longtime allies in the civil rights movement. The Rev. Joseph E. Lowery has supported Mr. Obama, for instance, while Representative John Lewis has defended Mrs. Clinton against accusations that she and her husband denigrated the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in an attack on Mr. Obama.

Another prominent Clinton supporter from the civil rights era, Andrew Young, also defended Mrs. Clinton. “Hillary Clinton, first of all, has Bill behind her,” Mr. Young said on a recent Webcast devoted to African-American issues. “And Bill is every bit as black as Barack.”

But a younger generation appears to be embracing Mr. Obama. Raphael G. Warnock, the 38-year-old senior pastor of Dr. King’s home church, Ebenezer Baptist here, gave Mr. Obama the honor of appearing there this coming Sunday, the day before the national King holiday.

Roanoke has long been a stronghold of the Alabama Democratic Conference, which endorsed Mrs. Clinton in part because its members believed that a black man could not be elected. But statewide, the group’s support of Mrs. Clinton may be tested by the Obama campaign’s insurgency.

“This is going to be another one of these watershed events in the black community,” said Hank Sanders, a state senator and former president of the Alabama New South Coalition, a group that has endorsed Mr. Obama.

Gerald W. Johnson, the pollster for the Alabama Education Association, a powerful teachers’ union that has endorsed Mrs. Clinton, said Mr. Obama’s victory in Iowa had demolished Mrs. Clinton’s substantial lead among Democrats in the state. Mr. Johnson predicted that black voters would make up half of the Democratic primary voters, up from the usual 40 percent.

But Ms. Clark-Frieson said she feared that the Obama momentum might not reach Roanoke.

“A.D.C. is going to spend a lot of money,” she said, “and they’re going to put out a ballot, and voters are going to follow that ballot to the letter because they’ve been doing that for 30 years. Those that might would consider voting for Barack won’t commit publicly because they don’t want to be seen as going against the A.D.C.”

That hesitancy cuts both ways. In Atlanta, Mark Johnson, a 35-year-old seminary student, said he was the first to put a political sign up in his predominantly black neighborhood. It was a Clinton sign. “My son said, ‘Dad, what if they throw rocks at the window?’ ” Mr. Johnson said.

Throughout the South, the considerations are complex, particularly when a black official represents a district of differing complexions and outlooks. Mr. Bishop, a black Democrat whose rural southwest Georgia district is mostly white and twice gave President Bush its vote, said he had carefully considered the comfort level of his conservative constituents before he endorsed Mr. Obama. “Hillary is not thought well of,” he said.

Ms. Bishop, who as clerk of court is the first African-American to hold citywide office in Columbus, agreed, saying she had delayed drawing attention to her endorsement of Mrs. Clinton to avoid angering her constituents. Ms. Bishop said she was more concerned about whites who disliked Mrs. Clinton than about blacks who might be disappointed that she had not supported a black candidate.

The Clinton campaign hopes its candidate will appeal as strongly to black women as she has to white women in earlier primaries. In Atlanta, Lucy Murphy, an active Democrat who works for a military contractor, said she was “going with gender all the way.” Ms. Murphy, 55 and black, said: “The working women will rise up. Black men believe if men take a stand, black women will follow. That’s why we are fortunate to be able to go in the voting booth without them.”

But female support for Mrs. Clinton is not uniform. Mayor Shirley Franklin of Atlanta, who had said she would remain neutral, made a surprise endorsement for Mr. Obama after hearing his victory speech in Iowa.

Some black women have complained that there are shades of chauvinism in the tide of support for Mr. Obama. But on a black radio talk show in Montgomery, Ala., last week, several men called to repudiate the conservative host, Kevin Elkins, who had said, “I don’t understand how any man that’s a man can want to hide behind the skirt of a woman for leadership.”

But those same callers did not say they would vote for Mrs. Clinton. One suggested that the recent furor over race in the campaign had eroded blacks’ affection for Bill Clinton. “With him trying to force-feed us Hillary, I think it’s jeopardizing his legacy,” the caller said.

Some of the traditional go-to organizations for Democratic votes in the South have crumbled since the last time a Clinton was on the ballot. In Memphis, the stronghold for black Democratic voters in Tennessee, the once-powerful Ford family, longtime Clinton supporters, has been all but dismantled by indictments, lost elections, illness and age. Mr. Obama opened an office there on Thursday, and though Mrs. Clinton did win the endorsement of the longtime mayor, Willie W. Herenton, who is black, she has no plans to follow suit.

“The only thing I can assume is that they figure that they can come into Memphis at the last minute and sweep up the black vote,” said D’Army Bailey, a state circuit court judge and black Democrat who supported Bill Clinton. “The field’s wide open for Obama to come in.”

Memphis did not see a spike in voter registrations after the Iowa caucuses — unlike, say, DeKalb County, a central Atlanta county that is 55 percent black. In the two days between the Iowa voting and the deadline to register, DeKalb County accepted more than 6,000 applications, as opposed to 545 in the two days before the deadline in 2004.

The Obama campaign is trying to make inroads even in Arkansas, but Clintonian roots run deep there and the task will be difficult.

“Younger folks may not have the allegiance that older blacks in Arkansas have to the Clintons,” said Tracy Steele, a state senator, “but we know that older people vote, and getting younger people to go to the polls is difficult.”

Nonetheless, Pat O’Brien, the Pulaski County clerk and an Obama supporter in Little Rock, said that with a campaign office newly opened, legions of Obama volunteers would finally have an outlet.

“My sense is that we’re going to have more volunteers and supporters than we can handle,” Mr. O’Brien said. “I think we’re going to be overwhelmed.”

(Reporting was contributed by Steve Barnes in Little Rock, Ark.; John Branston in Memphis; Clint Claybrook in Dadeville, Ala.; Coke Ellington in Montgomery, Ala.; and Brenda Goodman in Atlanta.)

LINK:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/18/us/politics/18south.html?em&ex=1200805200&en=e331a89c237e5b78&ei=5070

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

PACIFIC ISLANDER’S ANCESTRY REVEALED IN GENETIC STUDY

Published: January 18, 2008
The ancestral relationships of people living in the widely scattered islands of the Pacific Ocean, long a puzzle to anthropologists, may have been solved by a new genetic study, researchers reported Thursday.In an analysis of the DNA of 1,000 individuals from 41 Pacific populations, an international team of scientists found strong evidence showing that Polynesians and Micronesians in the central and eastern islands had almost no genetic relationship to Melanesians, in the western islands like Papua New Guinea and the Bismarck and Solomons archipelagos.

The researchers also concluded that the genetic data showed that the Polynesians and Micronesians were most closely related to Taiwan Aborigines and East Asians. They said this supported the view that these migrating seafarers originated in Taiwan and coastal China at least 3,500 years ago.

The findings were described in the online journal Public Library of Science Genetics (www.plosgenetics.org) by researchers led by Jonathan S. Friedlaender, professor emeritus of biological anthropology at Temple University. He was assisted in the data analysis by his wife, Françoise R. Friedlaender, an independent researcher. Other participants included scientists in the islands and at the Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation in Marshfield, Wis.

“Our analysis,” the scientists wrote, “indicates the ancestors of Polynesians moved through Melanesia relatively rapidly and only intermixed to a very modest degree with the indigenous populations there.”

Dr. Friedlaender of Temple said in an interview that the evidence was “substantial” and “solves a number of issues about the migration and settlement of Pacific people.”

In particular, he and other anthropologists not involved in the study said, the genetic research supported the “fast train” hypothesis. Increasing archaeological and linguistic evidence in recent years has suggested that ancestors of Micronesians and Polynesians had moved through Indonesia and Melanesia without having any significant contact there, culturally or genetically.

An alternative argument, the “slow boat” hypothesis, which had some support from male Y chromosome studies, raised the possibility that Polynesians were primarily Melanesians who had ventured on in their outrigger canoes. And a few anthropologists despaired of ever solving the mystery. Theirs was the “entangled bank” hypothesis.

The new genetic research, said Patrick V. Kirch, an anthropologist at the University of California, Berkeley, who is an authority on Pacific cultures, was “overwhelming biological evidence for a clear population movement out of Southeast Asia and Taiwan to Polynesia.”

Dr. Kirch, who did not participate in the genetic study, said that it reinforced research showing that Polynesian speech patterns were unrelated to Melanesian languages, suggesting — along with discoveries of the distinctive Lapita pottery across the Pacific — links to Taiwan and China, not Melanesia. “The combination of evidence shows we really can read this history,” he said.

As Dr. Friedlaender said, “If it wasn’t exactly an express train, it was pretty fast, and very few passengers climbed aboard or got off along the way.”

In the research, scientists examined more than 800 genetic markers known to be useful in distinguishing the ancestry of people. These involved mitochondrial DNA, passed down through females, and the Y chromosomes in males. Previous investigations along these lines had been conducted on a much smaller scale, Dr. Friedlaender said.

The new test results were repeatedly analyzed with a software program recently developed to classify genetic similarities and variations among different populations.

Primary support for the study was provided by the National Science Foundation, the Wenner-Gren Foundation of Anthropological Research, the National Geographic Society and the National Institutes of Health.

Further research to confirm the history of the Pacific diaspora, Dr. Friedlaender said, would require an expansion of genetic tests among people in the Philippines and Indonesia, regions that the migrants presumably passed through after leaving Taiwan more than 3,500 years ago, ultimately reaching as far as Hawaii and Easter Island. The Melanesians, on the other hand, probably arrived on their islands about 35,000 years ago, sometime later than the Aborigines reached Australia.

Years ago, a reporter who visited the Marshall Islands asked an aging Micronesian chief where his people came from long, long ago. “We have always been here,” he replied. Now, if it matters to them, his descendants have been given a more scientific answer.

LINK:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/18/world/asia/18islands.html?em&ex=1200805200&en=74fbda311fbb3b79&ei=5070

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

FACING DEPORTATION BUT CLINGING TO LIFE IN THE U.S.

(Sally Ryan for The New York Times)

Shop owners in Waukegan, Ill., say that the crackdown on illegal immigrants has kept their mostly Hispanic customers away.

Article Tools Sponsored By
 The New York Times
January 18, 2008
WAUKEGAN, Ill. — She is a homeowner, a taxpayer, a friendly neighbor and an American citizen. Yet because she is married to an illegal immigrant, these days she feels like a fugitive.

Whenever her Mexican husband ventures out of the house, “it makes me sick to my stomach,” said the woman, who insisted on being identified only by a first name and last initial, Miriam M.

“I’m like, ‘Oh, my God, he took too long,’ ” she said. “I’ll start calling. I go into panic.”

Over the last year, thousands of illegal immigrants and their families who live here have retreated from community life in Waukegan, a microcosm of a growing underground of illegal immigrants across the country who are clinging to homes and jobs despite the pressure of tougher federal and local enforcement.

From Illinois to Georgia to Arizona, these families are hiding in plain sight, to avoid being detected by immigration agents and deported. They do their shopping in towns distant from home, avoid parties and do not take vacations. They stay away from ethnic stores, forgo doctor’s visits and meetings at their children’s schools, and postpone girls’ normally lavish quinceañeras, or 15th birthday parties.

They avoid the police, even hesitating to report crimes.

“When we leave in the morning we know we are going to work,” said Elena G., a 47-year-old illegal Mexican immigrant and Waukegan resident of eight years who works in a factory near here. “ But we don’t know if we will be coming home.”

Last year, federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents arrested more than 35,000 illegal immigrants, including unauthorized workers and immigration fugitives, more than double the number in 2006. They sent 276,912 immigrants back to their home countries, a record number.

Since about three-quarters of an estimated 11.3 million illegal immigrants nationwide are from Latin America, and many have spouses, children or other relatives who are legal immigrants and citizens, the sense of alarm has spread broadly among Hispanics.

A survey by the Pew Hispanic Center, a nonpartisan research group in Washington, found in December that 53 percent of Hispanics in the United States worry that they or a loved one could be deported.

Stores catering to Hispanic immigrants in places like Atlanta and Cincinnati have closed because of the drop in customers. Michael L. Barrera, president of the United States Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, said anecdotal reports had indicated that small storefront businesses had been the hardest hit by a sharp decline in spending by immigrants.

“The raids have really spooked them in a big way,” said Douglas S. Massey, a Princeton demographer who has studied Mexican immigrants for three decades.

Based on his own surveys and recent reports from other scholars doing field research in the Southwest and in North Carolina and other states, Professor Massey said the “palpable sense of fear and of traumatization” in immigrant communities was more intense than at any other time since the mass deportations of Mexican farm workers in 1954.

Federal immigration officials say that stepped-up enforcement over the last year by the Bush administration and some local authorities has persuaded growing numbers of illegal immigrants to return home. But in places like Waukegan, a racially mixed middle-class suburb north of Chicago, most have chosen to stay, held by families and jobs.

This city has been an immigrant landing for generations. Latinos have been coming since the 1960s and now are 40 percent of the population of 91,000. The number of illegal immigrants among them swelled in the last decade.

Despite their illegal status, those immigrants found steady jobs in factories and landscaping. Lacking Social Security numbers, they used Internal Revenue Service taxpayer numbers to open stores and businesses, enroll in the community college and take out bank loans to buy cars and homes.

The welcome began to fade four years ago, when the city government increased fines and penalties for driving without a license. Since Illinois requires a valid Social Security number for a license, many illegal immigrants lost their cars when they could not afford the fees for impounded vehicles.

Last summer the City Council voted to enter an agreement with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the federal agency, to train Waukegan police officers to initiate deportations of immigrants who were convicted felons. While city officials insisted the officers would handle only cases of imprisoned criminals, rumors spread that the traffic police would check the immigration status of anyone they stopped.

Also, in recent months federal immigration agents conducted two big raids nearby.

“People came to me and said, ‘Father, when did we become the enemy?’ ” said the Rev. Gary M. Graf, a Roman Catholic priest whose Waukegan parish includes many Latino immigrants.

City officials said that the tougher traffic ordinances were not intended to single out illegal immigrants or Hispanics, but to reduce accidents with uninsured drivers.

“The only reason we did it was for safety,” Mayor Richard H. Hyde said. “We don’t want anybody on the road that doesn’t have a license.”

Nonetheless, for many residents fear has become a daily companion. One woman, a 37-year-old naturalized citizen who was born in Central America but grew up in Waukegan, has decided to stay away from the city even though her mother still lives here. The woman, a lawyer practicing in the Chicago area, fell in love with an illegal immigrant from Guatemala.

After they were married in 2004, she realized that under immigration law it would be difficult for him to become legal, even though she is a citizen. Because he had crossed the border illegally, seeking legal status would require him to return to Guatemala for years of separation, with no guarantee of success. She abandoned plans to move back to Waukegan. She and her husband feel safer in Chicago, with its large Hispanic population.

“I know everything about Waukegan; it’s my town,” said the woman, who asked to remain anonymous because of her husband’s status. “I know the high school, the first Mexican restaurant. I should feel free to go in and out whenever I want to. But it’s not the same freedom anymore.”

Raimundo V., 30, an illegal Mexican immigrant who has lived here for 13 years, said he canceled repairs on his home, which he owns, stopped buying in local stores, and was trying to save as much money as he could in case he should be arrested and deported.

“My expectation here is to be prepared for anything that comes,” Raimundo said.

Miriam M. and her husband, married in 2004, own a tidy house on a peaceful street and are raising four children from previous marriages, all United States citizens. He runs his own landscaping company, paying business and property taxes.

Even though Miriam M. is a citizen, it is difficult for her husband to obtain legal papers, since he entered illegally from Mexico 12 years ago. She did not focus on her husband’s illegal status when she first met him.

“Boyfriend and girlfriend, you don’t think much about it,” she said. “All right, maybe I didn’t want to think much about it.”

Now he stays close to home and avoids downtown Waukegan, driving around the city limits when he can.

Another immigrant, L. Gómez, 36, a Colombian recently on her way to becoming legal, said she had gone to the police and the courts in years past for protection from a violent husband. Since the crackdown, she said, she has avoided the authorities, even when her husband threatened her.

Hispanic business owners in Waukegan complain of a sales slump that they said went beyond the effects of a sluggish national economy.

“People are turning away from Waukegan business and going elsewhere to invest or to buy,” said Porfirio García, a Mexican-American who is president of Exit/Re-Gar Realty, a real estate brokerage firm.

At the Belvidere Mall, which caters to Hispanic customers, María Sotelo, a legal Mexican immigrant, said she was closing her store there after 17 years because her sales dropped in the last six months to $500 a week from $5,000. She sold satin and voile dresses for quinceañera parties and T-shirts from Mexican soccer teams.

“Since it all started with immigration, people don’t come here anymore,” Ms. Sotelo said.

Mr. Hyde and other city officials said they expected to wait several years before Congress adopted new laws to control illegal immigration. Meanwhile, the mayor said, he will do what he can by enforcing local law.

“Do I believe in closing the borders?” Mr. Hyde said. “Do I believe in putting troops down there? You bet your life. Illegal is illegal, and that’s the end of the conversation, really.”

(Article courtesy of The new York Times:  http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/18/us/18hide.html?em&ex=1200805200&en=df40443fbf9f3ad3&ei=5070

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

SPITTIN’ ACID AT THE SISTAHS

Spittin' Acid at the Sistahs:

Rap(e) & The Assault of Black Women


Copyright 2005 by Ewuare Osayande


***************************************************************************************************************

Hardly anyone in the Black community would advocate, support or sanction the rape and sexual assault of Black women; yet everyday Black women are being assaulted by Black male rappers, hip hop culture and the recording industry that condones, supports and profits from it.

From the lyrics on the radio to the videos on the tube, Black male rappers engage in an aural and visual assault on the minds and bodies of Black women. This cultural attack on Black women would warrant a state-of-emergency even if the madness began and ended in the studios, but it doesn’t. More and more, Black men and boys are reciting these lyrics until they become the mental script that directs their interactions with Black women even as these tracks
advocate the real-life hatred and violence toward women.

But what Nelly and his fellow rap cohorts fail to realize is that for every time they swipe a credit card through a Black female’s behind and cash in on this oppressive profit-making scam, someone else is swiping one through their own asses as they remain bent in the position of submission to a system that views them as property too.

At face value, many would dismiss my description and assessment as being over the top, but upon close examination, one will realize that the critical condition of the situation cannot be overstated. My words fall way short of capturing the deadly effect misogynistic rap is having on Black women. The fact is that what many rappers are spewing is criminal by most societies’ standards.

According to Black’s Law Dictionary sexual assault is defined as “Any willful attempt or threat to inflict injury upon the person of another, when coupled with an apparent present ability so to do, and any intentional display of force such as would give the victim reason to fear or expect immediate bodily harm, constitutes an assault. An assault may be committed without actually or striking, or doing bodily harm, to the person of another.” (p. 114)

As the definition clarifies, assault doesn’t need actual physical contact to be considered such. The mere threat of violence is all that is required. Clearly what rap has become, what it constitutes and perpetuates is a direct threat to Black women who relate to men who listen to and are persuaded by a music that prides itself on being the epitome of reality, not the studio-contrived production that it really is. Given this, Black women walk under the constant threat of being preyed upon by men that step to the beat of a sampled drum loop produced by platinum-laced pied pipers who proclaim themselves pimps.

The combination of violent lyrics and pornographic images result in a poisonous concoction that is literally numbing our youth to the deadly ramifications of what the record industry has made rap to be. Increasingly rap is becoming synonymous with rape as record execs are using rap to violate the minds of our youth with pornographic images even as it works to justify and perpetuate the actual rape of Black women.

What becomes clear through all of this is the role of the state and the corporate structure in producing an image of Black women as “bitch/ho” to substantiate their continued subjugation for the purpose of their economic exploitation. For example, if the corporate structure can convince young Black women at an early age that prostituting one’s body is not a bad life-choice and the state denies the majority of them access to a sound education and economic opportunity even as it demonizes them for making that “choice,” then the role becomes a self-perpetuating prophecy that gets fulfilled with each successive generation. In so doing, this
form of social entrapment will ensure that elite men can reap the illicit economic benefits of this debilitating cycle.

Manning Marable describes in particular detail how this process emerged as it relates to the racist/sexist image of Black women and the impact that image would have on their actual lives.

“The Depression and war years produced within the popular culture the figure of the Sapphire: a Black woman who was ‘evil, treacherous, bitchy, stubborn, and hateful.’ The Sapphire stereotype was utilized by White males, who ‘could justify their dehumanization and sexual exploitation of Black women,’ and by males, who could reasonably ‘claim that they could not get along with Black women because they were so evil.'” (p. 85)

Today, this has manifested in an inter-racial alliance of White and Black men who are reaping tremendous profits from the overt exploitation of this sexualized Sapphire stereotype. In truth it is a tri-racial alliance as many Asian execs, producers, writers, and artists are attempting to cash in on the crass display of subjugated Black female sexuality. As such, this capitalist assembly line production of CDs, DVDs and magazines amounts to a gang rape of Black female identity.

The now infamous image of a man swiping a credit card through the crack of a Black female’s backside in rap star Nelly’s video “Tip Drill” exposes the way these rappers, the recording industry and their eager clientele view Black women: as commodity, as property. Period. Their value is only determined by the degree that they can be violated.

But what Nelly and his fellow rap cohorts fail to realize is that for every time they swipe a credit card through a Black female’s behind and cash in on this oppressive profit-making scam, someone else is swiping one through their own asses as they remain bent in the position of submission to a system that views them as property too. But then again, maybe they do realize it, and just fail to care given the amount of fame and fortune that has come their way. But
what we must realize is that there are millions of Black girls who are being violated in the name of hip hop culture and reap no profit from it whatsoever. And so the question that faces the Black community is: Do we care?

The lines between what is art and what is reality are blurring when artists’ marketability is based on a street credibility that they are expected to tote. And in too many cases Black women are the casualties of their rap mantra of “keeping it real.”

It has become an expectation that every gangsta rapper’s CD will have an obligatory “Beat that Ho” song in their rap repertoire. Gangsta rappers take the persona of the pimp as their
street archetype of choice. To be a pimp means that the possibility of slapping, beating or otherwise assaulting a woman is just a look or a word away. This valorization of violence sits at the center of the current image of the rapper. And many rappers are being turned out by an industry that is invested in keeping Black men in the role of violent-prone sexual predator.

50 Cent, one of the most popular rappers on the scene today, is heard intimidating a woman on his 2003 top ten track, ” P.I.M.P.” that stayed in rotation on radio for weeks upon its
release:

Bitch choose with me, I’ll have you stripping in the street/
Put my other hoes down, you get your ass beat/
Now Nick is my bottom bitch, she always come up with my bread/
The last nigga she was with put stitches in her head.

Beanie Sigel’s “Watch Your Bitches” from his Def Jam release entitled The Reason takes an even more morbid turn when he threatens a woman with

bye bye bitch/
fuck that red dress on/
get a head step on/
speed on before you get peed on/
when I piss I don’t miss/
get mad, scratch your ass and get glad/
before I scratch your ass and get Glad bags/
throw your shit out on the trash.

The celebrated rap producer Dr. Dre is heard in his rap “Housewife” from the CD Dr. Dre 2001 saying,

Naw hoe is short for honey/
almost had her wailing like Bunny/
telling tales of being pregnant, catching Nordstrom sales with abortion money/
I spotted her seeing her with my niggas when I shot at her.

On Lil John’s track “Bitches Aint Shit” from the popular Crunk Juice CD, he regurgitates the master/slave relationship with him, a Black man, assuming the role of the master with the Black
woman as his slave.

Acting all sophisticated spending money that she didn’t make/
I get so mad that I could slap her acting like she Cleopatra/
aint no need to ask she’s a slave to the money and I’m the master.

Snoop Doggy Dogg has an entire track about beating women on his latest CD R&G: (Rhythm and Gangsta) The Masterpiece. The rap, “Can U Control Yo Hoe” has Snoop schooling another guy on how to beat the woman he is living with. The chorus is instructive in its brutality:

Can you control your hoe? (You got a bitch that won’t obey what you say)/
You can’t control your hoe? (She hardheaded, she just won’t obey)/
Can you control your hoe (You’ve got to know what to do, what to say)/
You’ve got to put that bitch in her place, even if it’s slapping her in her face/
Ya got to control your hoe/
Can you control your hoe?

Later in the track he says,

What kind of pimp holds back?/
Never met a bitch that a pimp can’t slap/
What’s wrong with pimpin’?

This is the same Snopp Dogg that gets featured in movies and commercials selling fabric softener! It is also the same Snoop Dogg that produces porn and “Girls Gone Wild” videos. These self-admitted womanizers and women-beaters are rewarded and celebrated in our society, and we see nothing wrong with this?

Some might argue that this is just a case of “boys being boyz.” “No harm done. They’re just acting. It’s all entertainment.” But as an article in a recent issue of Vibe magazine delineates,
this verbal assault is just a description of what many of these rappers actually do in their personal lives.

According to the article “Rap’s Black Eye” rapper Big Pun (now deceased) sent his wife Liza Rios to the hospital three times over the course of their ten year relationship and “prevented her
from seeking medical attention on many other occasions.” Recounting one episode Liza Rios is quoted as saying, “One time he told me to change the batteries in his beeper . I totally forgot about it, and he took a lead pipe and started swinging on me. I had my daughter in my arms, and I told Cuban (another rapper) to take the baby. After he finished beating me, my elbow was twisted out of place. I was limping for two months.” For Liza Rios and numerous
other women, the last thing this is is entertaining.

As Elizabeth Mendez Berry questions expose the main issue here: “When you get paid to call every woman a ho, at what point do you start believing you are a pimp?” 50 Cent’s rap, “P.I.M.P.” would suggest as soon as the ink on your recording contract dries. And many rappers and would-be rappers are in agreement with him.

Rapper Mystical of “Shake that Ass” fame pleaded guilty to sexual battery after assaulting a woman in January 2004 — an incident that was caught on video tape. Damon Dash has had at least one order of protection granted against him and has been arrested several times for reported domestic abuse. Busta Rhymes has also had a restraining order imposed against him by a woman who has children by him. Rapper Charli Baltimore has gone on record describing the abuse she experienced at the hands of none other than the Notorious B.I.G. (Christopher Wallace). Also, friends of his wife Faith Evans have spoken out about how the bruises she covered under make-up and sunglasses didn’t stop until after his murder.

A childhood friend of Wallace has said that he “treated women like a pimp with his hos . He would talk about hitting them. He’d say things like, ‘She was out of pocket, so I had to put that bitch back in line.”

Biggie protégé and former partner of Dash, Jay-Z, would find himself embroiled in a controversy after video of him smacking on a woman repeatedly surfaced on the net. His Roc-A-Fella Records, in L.A.P.D. fashion, would have us not believe our lying eyes and claim that the video tape was wrong. Their press statement titled, “Jay-Z Was Not Beating a Woman,” is a clear attempt at damage control. They would have us believe that it was a case of Jay-Z just playing
around with an old friend from the neighborhood. “Love taps. That’s all. She was enjoying herself as she was being knocked to the floor!”

The Black community’s relative reluctance to call this behavior for what it is —sexist— and resist it on all fronts as an act of sexual assault on all Black women, has resulted in the normalization and general acceptance of calling Black women by a name used to refer to a female dog. And once you start calling someone a dog, it is not a stretch to begin treating them like a dog.

Pearl Cleage details the socialization process that teaches us all to accept the dehumanization of Black women when she writes in Mad at Miles that, “It is impossible to live in America and not be tainted by sexism and a participant in it, either as a victim or a perpetrator. As women, by the end of our African American girlhoods, we have learned and perfected a dizzying variety of slave behaviors which we are rewarded for mastering by the men who made them up in the first place.

As men, they were taught that we were inferior, unworthy of their respect, subject to their whim and present on earth primarily for their sexual pleasure and the bearing and mothering of their children.

We were all taught that it is acceptable for them to hit us when they think we have “asked for it” and that their opinions carry more weight in all critical decisions simply because they were men and therefore assumed to be of superior knowledge and more vast experience.” (p. 41)

No, rap music did not start the abuse, assault or rape of Black women, but it does advocate, glorify, justify and condone it— and as such— it works to reinforce and ensure its continuation and survival. Rap music and the rappers who create and produce it are responsible for the impact of their message on the minds of impressionable youth. When a sixteen or seventeen year old boy hears a rapper he admires counsel him to “smack that bitch,” why do we think that he would not consider doing that? What other force is as compelling that is advising him not to strike a woman, when the majority of mediums in American life only reinforce his destructive desires? Who are we fooling? None but ourselves if we think we can deny the impact rap(e) music is having on the minds and behavior of our youth. These would-be men are living their lives saturated by a socially accepted soundtrack that is riddled through with references to women as dogs that can and should be treated as such, kicked or killed at will.

In her article, Elizabeth Mendez Berry cites the scary stat that “Murder at the hands of a romantic partner is a leading cause of among African American women between the ages of 15 -24 according to the National Center for Health Statistics. “The bruised bodies of Black women in inner-city streets and suburban homes are proof enough of the damage being done in the name of being true to a game that nobody wins.”

Further evidence of the normalization of abuse and assault of Black women is popuar New York radio station Hot 97’s “Smackfest.” Promoted like a pro boxing match, two women are squared
off in a contest to see who can outlast who as they take turns smacking each other in the face with the hope of winning a consolation prize. In one video contest one woman is slapped to the point of busting her lip. The Black male DJ stops the match intervening with “we got mouth blood,” only to have them return and keep beating on each other.

Smackfest has currently been shut down by New York state officials after City officials intervened, citing a state law that protects people from dangerous and demeaning competitions. According to the State Athletic Commission, Smackfest is an unlicensed and illegal
boxing match that could lead to Hot 97 executives and their parent company Emmis Communications being indicted and charged.

Smackfest represents the latest stage in the devolution of hip hop culture. Just when you thought the culture could not get any more crass, here comes Smackfest. Now that the abuse of Black women has been normalized, embraced and defended, poor Black women are being
super-exploited and their rights violated to increase radio ratings. A stew of hyper-sexual sadomasochistic rhetoric and imagery bombards the senses of America’s youth everyday and Black females are the most targeted and hardest hit. And now many are being programmed to
see no wrong in hitting each other. Rendered invisible as they are simply seen as hoes, bitches, nameless gold-diggers who will do just about any damn thing for a dollar even allow themselves to be peed, spat, or hit on for the hope of getting paid and being seen.

This Smackfest is very reminiscent of another exploitative and oppressive contest known as the Battle Royale. It is described in bone-chilling detail in Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man. Black
adolescent boys are blindfolded and herded into a makeshift boxing ring that is surrounded by the White men who watch them pummel each other until one is left standing. They are then carted into an adjacent space where the blindfolds are lifted enabling them to see a mound of coins and a dollar bills on a rug. They are told that they can have as much as their hands can carry. So they commence to grab with a greed born of impoverished need. Only to learn that it
is all a hoax being played at their expense. As soon as their fingers touched the coins, they were sent convulsing in shocks of pain. The coins were charged and these White men sat there laughing in evil delight as they watched these bloodied Black boys electrified like live wire. That day those boys learned what it meant to be young Black and poor in America. It means to be
vulnerable. It means to be easily exploitable. It means to be invisible. This is the same lesson Black women are learning about America today. And the irony is that many of their teachers are
Black men.

Today Black men are choosing to emerge out of their invisibility against the shadowy backdrop of battered and bruised bodies of Black women. In the process muffling their voices and rendering their female truths invisible.

As the late Audre Lorde observed,

Because of the continuous battle against racial erasure that Black women and Black men share, some Black women still refuse to recognize that we are also oppressed as women, and that sexual hostility against Black women is practiced not only by the White racist society, but implemented within our own Black communities as well. It is a disease striking the heart of Black nationhood, and silence will not make it disappear. Exacerbated by racism and the pressures of powerlessness, violence against Black women and children often becomes a standard within our communities, one by which manliness can be measured. But these women-hating acts are rarely discussed as crimes against Black women. (p. 119-120)

It is that kind of communal silence that enables the rate of assault, rape and even murder to continue to wreak havoc and heartache in our community.

At the time of this writing, a 33 year-old Black woman named Lisa Eatmon was recently found dead in the Hudson River in New York. Eatmon was pregnant with Roscoe Glinton’s child. According to friend’s of Eatmon’s, Glinton, a Black man, wanted her to have an abortion, but Eatmon intended to give birth. Glinton, a suspect in this case, would lead police on a high-speed chase, having his wife and child in the car with him. He is currently in police custody. Police found blood at his workplace, a sanitation plant that sits right on the Hudson River.

This case could easily have been a rap song penned by B.I.G., Snoop or 50 Cent. But it isn’t. It is the real life account of the murder of another Black woman. It is a story that hovers like an
imposing dark cloud over the lives of thousands of Black women each day who wonder if they will be next.

The normalization of the abuse of Black women only works to condone such crimes and leaves the Black community complicit in the beatings and killings that go down. No lyric is innocent when it advocates the outright infliction of violence on the bodies of Black women. We are implicated in this madness until it stops, for who will be the ones to stop it, except ourselves?

This truth is brought brutally home in the case of Cherae Williams, a Black woman from the Bronx who called 911 after being beaten by her boyfriend in September 1999 only to be beaten again by the officers who arrived on the scene. According to a CNN report, when police officers Damian Mercaida and James Caputo failed to intervene, Williams asked for their names and shield numbers. It was at that point that “Eyewitnesses say she was shoved into the
police car and driven away.” Williams was then driven to a secluded area and assaulted by the officers. She would undergo surgery at the Bronx Lebanon Hospital to repair a broken jaw. “She also had a fractured nose and a large cut on her forehead.” Although both officers deny the charges, after the NYPD’s Internal Affairs Bureau conducted DNA testing, they “found that blood stains from Caputo’s clothing and Mercaida’s handcuffs matched that of the victim.”

The case of Lisa Eatmon and Cherae Williams exposes the fact that for too many Black women there are pitifully few resources; they have no recourse. The justice system is trifling when it comes to enacting justice on the behalf of Black people in general. Our reluctance to acknowledge the sexism in our community and put an end to the abuse of Black women and girls is just as trifling. We are quick to rally when a sister has been raped by a White guy, but will deride the same sister if she is raped by a Black guy, especially if the Black guy is famous. Our contradictions only leave us wide open for criticism as a community.

If Black people cannot rely on the justice system for our protection, then we are especially pressured to act justly toward each other. And every ounce of our communal energy should be spent insuring such.

Those who refuse to address our intra-racial abuse and state their motivation as that “we should not air our dirty laundry,” are not dealing in reality. The fact is that the stench of our “dirty laundry” is being dispersed worldwide. It is being bottled and sold on the marketplace as the latest perfume and cologne as many in our community are profiting from the proliferation of pornographic and violent images of violated Black women.

When writing about addressing and putting an end to the abuse, I am not echoing the “respect and protect the Black woman” rhetoric that is the popular chant of some groups either. That
rhetoric is just that. As good as it may sound to some, it doesn’t remedy the problem. Never mind the fact that it is problematic to begin with given that the slogan implies protection of Black women by Black men thereby reinforcing the notion that women should look to men for protection rather than create their own forms and forces of self-defense. It is not our duty as Black men to define protection for Black women. Rather, it is our duty to take their direction when it comes to how they want to be treated and addressed.

But sisters ain’t waiting on us brothers to get our act together. Although conditions are beyond dismal, Black women are not taking this lying down. Many women have been, and even more are becoming, active in their local communities. Black women all over this country are taking their bodies back from the marketplace, resisting violence and domestic abuse, redefining their relationships to men and this male dominant system.

Nationally, Aishah Simmons’ NO! The Rape Documentary has become a rallying cry for our times. Her nearly decade-long sojourn to give voice to the silenced memories of Black female survivors of rape, incest and sexual molestation stands as a clear example that African American women are refusing to remain silent.

When rapper Nelly wanted to host a bone marrow drive on Spelman’s campus, Black women protested to hold him accountable for his demeaning display of Black women in his music and videos. Moya Bailey, president of the Feminist Majority Leadership Alliance, and other student activists had to withstand a barrage of criticism from every side — and did — in the effort to make their point. They were not about to allow Nelly to come to use them in his effort to
make himself look good only to turn around and make another (s)exploitative video.

Conferences and community dialogues are taking place all over the country and many more are still needed. No only is our future at stake, our very present is precarious. What we do now is what matters most.

As Black men, we are challenged and encouraged by none other than the man that Ossie Davis called “our living Black manhood,” Malcolm X. Let us be guided in this work by Malcolm’s self-critical words as expressed in a letter written to his cousin-in-law Hakim Jamal just one month before his assassination as quoted in an essay written by Barbara Ransby and Tracye Matthews published in the anthology Words of Fire:

I taught brothers not only to deal unintelligently with the devil or the White woman, but I also taught many brothers to spit acid at the sisters. They were kept in their places — you probably didn’t notice this in action, but it is a fact. I taught these brothers to spit acid at the sisters. I taught the brothers that the sisters were standing in their way . I did these things brother. I must undo them.

Let us in the spirit of “Our Living Black Manhood” also undo the spitting of acid at the sisters that still continues and in so doing build up a new generation of Black men who refuse to define
manhood based on their ability to manipulate, control or otherwise threaten the lives of women.

Until we do, how can we expect Black women to trust us?

Pearl Cleage, speaking to women, gives us men direction on this question.

If Black men won’t admit that their sexism and male chauvinism and domestic violence are problems, how can we consider them allies in the search for creative solutions? We can’t. Not yet. Not until they are willing to redefine their Black male reality to incorporate the equally valid reality of our Black female experiences. Not until they are prepared to
recognize their role as oppressors in the struggle against sexism and see their crimes as no less serious than the crimes committed in defense of racism.”  (pg. 39)

Ewuare Osayande (www.osayande.org) is an activist and author of several books including Gangsta Rap is Dead (1996) and the forthcoming Blood Luxury to be published by Africa World Press in 2005. This essay is taken from his forthcoming book Misogyny and the Emcee: Exposing the (S)exploitation of Black Women in Hip Hop. He is the creator and facilitator of Project ONUS: Redefining Black Manhood, a series of anti-sexist workshops for Black men.

— April 29, 2005

Sources Cited
“2 NYPD Officers Indicted for September Assault of Woman.”
Web page [accessed
March 15, 2005]. Available at
http://archives.cnn.com/2000/US/03/01/officers.indicted/.
“Police Question Boyfriend of Woman Found Floating in Hudson.” 2005.
Web page [accessed
April 12, 2005]. Available at
http://www.nbc10.com/print/4368306/detail.html.Black’s Law Dictionary (6th Edition). 1990. St. Paul, MN: West
Publishing Company.

Berry, Elizabeth Mendez. 2005. “Rap’s Black Eye.” Web
page [accessed
March 2, 2005]. Available at

http://www.vibe.com/print.php?sid=645. Cleage, Pearl. 1990. Mad at Miles: A Black Woman’s Guide to Truth. Atlanta: The Cleage Group.


Dicker, Frederic U. 2005. “Hot 97’s Vicious `Smackfest’ KO’d.” Web page [accessed
March 25, 2005]. Available at

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=425&u=/nypost/20050325/lo_nypost/hot9.Farrell, Elizabeth F. 2004. “It’s Getting Hot in Here.” Web page [accessed March 2, 2005]. Available at http://lists.acpa.nche.edu/read/messages?id=10846. Guy-Sheftall, Beverly, ed. 1995. Words of Fire: An Anthology of
African-American Feminist Thought.
New York: The New Press.
Lorde, Audre. 1984. Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches. Trumansburg, NY: The Crossing Press.


Marable, Manning. 2000. How Capitalism Underdeveloped Black
America
(Updated Edition).
Cambridge, MA: South End Press.


Simmons, Aisha. NO! The Rape Documentary:

http://www.notherapedocumentary.org.– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Ewuare Osayande (www.osayande.org) is an activist and author of several books including Gangsta Rap is Dead (1996) and the forthcoming Blood Luxury to be published by Africa World Press in 2005. This essay is taken from his forthcoming book Misogyny and the Emcee: Exposing the (S)exploitation of Black Women in Hip Hop. He is the creator and facilitator of Project ONUS: Redefining Black Manhood, a series of anti-sexist workshops for Black men.

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

SHAKER HEIGHTS: A SUBURB LOOKS NERVOUSLY AT ITS URBAN NEIGHBOR

 

(David Ahntholz for The New York Times)

Luiz Coelho, left, Ken Kovach and Tom Chelimsky in front of Mr. Chelimsky’s house, where a neighbor was found severely beaten.

Article Tools Sponsored By
 January 17, 2008
SHAKER HEIGHTS, Ohio — A week after six black teenagers nearly beat her husband to death, Marybeth McDermott looked out her big living room window at the neighborhood she loves, pursed her lips, then looked away.

(David Ahntholz for The New York Times)

Mr. Chelimsky, left, his wife, Gisela, right, and Margaret Carlson gave a flier to Kevin Bowie about a neighborhood meeting.

The New York Times

Part of the Ludlow neighborhood is in Cleveland, the other part is in Shaker Heights.

She has found great friends here in the Ludlow neighborhood, one of the first places in suburban America where blacks and whites came together to live as neighbors. But for the first time in 19 years, Mrs. McDermott has thoughts of leaving.

“For now, I think we’ll stay put,” Mrs. McDermott said, just before driving to visit her husband in the hospital. “After that, I can’t say. We love the diversity here. But we have to weigh that against our safety.”

The attack on her husband, Kevin McDermott, a 52-year-old white lawyer, has raised concerns about safety, race and integration that many people here thought were laid to rest long ago.

Mr. McDermott was taking a walk early New Year’s Eve when a group of young African-Americans attacked him from behind. They slashed his face, kicked him, and mashed his leg with a lead pipe, the police said. A neighbor banging on a window scared the teenagers away.

“It was so random and mindless, and that’s what makes people afraid,” said Chris Luciani, a white Ludlow resident.

Six suspects, ages 14 to 19 and all Cleveland residents, are in custody. They have been charged with felonious assault and attempted murder. “But for the neighbor, he probably would have been killed,” said Bill Mason, the prosecutor for Cuyahoga County, which includes Shaker Heights and Cleveland.

Scott Lee, the acting police chief of Shaker Heights, said the beating was a random crime of opportunity and was not gang-related.

Ludlow is a neighborhood of tidy Tudor and colonial homes with small yards shaded by mature sycamore trees. Part of the neighborhood lies in the affluent suburb of Shaker Heights and the other part lies in Cleveland, the fourth-poorest city in the country, according to the Census Bureau. Children on both sides of the neighborhood attend Shaker Heights public schools. The only way to know which city you are in is to look for the street signs, which in Cleveland are blue and in Shaker Heights are white.

Mr. McDermott was attacked on a quiet street one block south of Ludlow Elementary School, which in the 1950s and ’60s became the center of Shaker Heights’s successful integration effort.

“The concept that something like that could happen here literally never crossed my mind,” said the Rev. Diane Ford Jones, an African-American resident of Ludlow.

Petty thefts are rising near the edges of Shaker Heights, so two years ago the city increased its police budget by $50,000 annually to pay for more patrols along the border, said Mayor Earl M. Leiken. Since the attack, unmarked police cars circle the Shaker Heights streets of Ludlow every five minutes. There is no increased police presence on the Cleveland side, residents say.

Since the beating, Ludlow residents say they pay more attention to their surroundings as they walk their dogs at night. They make sure to lock their doors, even when they are at home. Some plan to install motion-detector lights, alarm systems and security cameras.

What has surprised Ludlow residents most since the attack is the reaction of people around the region. Cleveland has grown steadily poorer over the last five decades. Many people in the surrounding area believe that Shaker Heights will eventually be overwhelmed by Cleveland residents, many of them African-Americans, trying to escape the city’s high crime rate and struggling schools. They wonder why residents of Shaker Heights have not moved to more distant — and safer — suburbs.

“So move,” Dick Feagler, a columnist for The Cleveland Plain Dealer, wrote after the attack. “But do it like we all have — like the whole three-county area has — don’t call it racism. Call it reality.”

Underneath this fear of urban decay lies the quiet thread of resentment. For many years, Shaker Heights was one of the richest cities in the United States. As presidents of Cleveland’s largest companies, a few Shaker Heights citizens were bosses to generations of Clevelanders. In the middle of what the Census Bureau found in 2002 to be America’s third-most-segregated urban area, Shaker Heights flouts local racial attitudes by actively encouraging integration. Of the town’s 27,245 residents, 61 percent are white and 34 percent are black, according to the census.

For many outsiders, the attack on Mr. McDermott is seen as comeuppance for a community that seemed smug about its wealth, security and racial diversity.

“I wonder how much ‘tolerance’ the ‘progressive,’ snooty, pseudo-intellectual limousine liberal, socialists of Shaker Heights will show now that the thugs are in their neighborhood too,” a reader wrote on a Cleveland Plain Dealer blog.

Ludlow residents understand that for a place just seven blocks across, their little neighborhood carries tremendous symbolic weight.

“People in the Cleveland area resent us because we’re a repudiation of everything they believe,” said Brian Walker, 56, who was among the first African-Americans to attend Ludlow school. “We’re proof that white people and black people can live together.”

Rather than flee, Ludlow residents say they plan to stay and organize.

“You can’t run forever,” said Tom Chelimsky, co-president of the Ludlow Community Association. The beating occurred on Mr. Chelimsky’s front lawn. “We’re not naïve. We’re tough, and we’re going to stand together.”

Christine Branche, 80, an African-American who moved into Ludlow in 1956, said, “I’ll move from this house into an urn.”

Five days after the attack, neighbors met at Ludlow school to grieve and plan a response. Another meeting is planned for this weekend. So many friends, black and white, have offered to help the McDermotts that the family will not need to cook for itself until March, Mrs. McDermott said.

“I don’t know Kevin McDermott,” said Ms. Jones, the minister. “But when I see him I’m going to give him a big hug and say: ‘Your neighbors love you. We’re glad you’re here.’ ”

(Aticle courtesy of The New York Times:  http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/17/us/17shaker.html?em&ex=1200805200&en=79b6becea7c46d61&ei=5087%0A )

Related

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

DON’T TIE THE NEXT PRESIDENT’S HANDS

 January 17, 2008
The New York Times
President Bush is discussing a new agreement with Baghdad that would govern the deployment of American troops in Iraq. With so many Americans adamant about bringing our forces home as soon as possible, a sentiment we strongly share, Mr. Bush must not be allowed to tie the hands of his successor and ensure the country’s continued involvement in an open-ended war.

The BoardAdditional commentary, background information and other items by Times editorial writers.

The Board Blog

 

Go to The Board »

Readers’ Comments

“I am just glad to learn there is a legal basis for the current occupation. Who knew?”

James Mwaura, Brooklyn, N.Y.

Given what’s at stake in Iraq in terms of American and Iraqi lives lost, national treasure and broad national security interests, the negotiations on any new agreement must be fully transparent — which they are not. The national debate must be vigorous and thoughtful, and then Congress must vote on whatever deal results.

The White House and the Iraqi government decided in December to pursue the pact as a way to define long-term relations between the two countries, including the legal status of American military forces in Iraq. The ostensible goal is a more durable political, economic and security relationship than is possible under a United Nations resolution, the current international legal basis for the American military presence in Iraq.

Iraqi officials, increasingly unhappy with restrictions on sovereignty because of the presence of 160,000 foreign troops, have said that they won’t extend the United Nations mandate beyond this year. A Washington-Baghdad deal would have to take its place for the troops to stay.

Formal negotiations won’t start until February and few details are known, but already the two sides are laying down markers. The Iraqi defense minister, Abdul Qadir — apparently tone-deaf to the American political debate — told The Times’s Thom Shanker that his nation would not be able to take full responsibility for its internal security until 2012 or be able to defend its own borders from external threat at least until 2018.

That is far too long for most Americans, but not for Mr. Bush, who is quite comfortable leaving American troops fighting in Iraq for another decade.

A related issue concerns whether the agreement would grant assurances that America would help Iraq defend against foreign aggression — something a senior White House official says has not been ruled out. That’s a worrying prospect. Such guarantees could further encourage Iraqi dependence on the American military and might draw the United States into a regional conflict.

Among other questions still to be answered are how long the United States wants basing rights in Iraq and how it might assuage Iraqis demanding the right to try American troops and contractors accused of killing civilians and other misdeeds. (The United States almost always brings troops home for trial.)

Mr. Bush is rushing to complete a deal before he leaves office in January 2009. That is just as reckless and irresponsible as most of his decisions regarding Iraq. America’s interests demand that his successor has maximum flexibility to plot a course, which we hope includes a quick and orderly withdrawal of troops.

One way to ensure that flexibility is to make sure that Congress approves any deal with Iraq, as leading Democrats, including Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, are insisting. The time for Congressional intervention is now.

(Article courtesy of The New York Times:  http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/17/opinion/17thu1.html

************************************************************************************************************

The above editorial is one of  17 “Articles of Opinion” editorials. Click on the link above to read all of the editorials.)

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

MANUFACTURING PIMPS: REWARDING THE VIOLENT REPRESSION OF BLACK WOMEN

Manufacturing Pimps:
Rewarding the Violent Repression of Black Women from Hip Hop to Hollywood

Copyright 2006 by Ewuare OsayandeWho would have ever thought that a song outright denigrating women and celebrating their actual oppression would be deemed worthy of an Oscar? Yet that is exactly what happened at this year’s Academy Awards when Three 6 Mafia won the Oscar for “Best Original Song” for “It’s Hard Out Here for a Pimp,” the title track to the Paramount Classics film Hustle and Flow. The rap song is written from the perspective of the pimp protagonist, who rhymes about the sex trade:“Wait I got a snow bunny and black girl too/ You pay the right price and they’ll both do you/ That’s the way the game goes, gotta keep it strictly pimpin’/ Gotta have my hustle tight, making change off these women, yeah”

The American acceptance and embrace of the pimp as cultural icon was symbolically captured as the members of Three 6 Mafia squeezed the gold frame of the Oscar statue in acceptance of their reward. From its inner-city origins to Hollywood’s center stage, the social acceptance of the pimp is no longer a subject of speculation; it is now a fact of history.

On the surface, the revival of pimp fascination can be attributed to the rap industry as more and more hip hop artists have donned the pimp icon as mantle of choice. Hip hop has always had its rappers who praised the pimp “lifestyle.” During the early days of hip hop, rappers such as Too Short and Ice-T became famous for their tales of macking and pimp slapping. Yet they were peripheral at best. Today, rappers across the regional and ideological spectrum have embraced the image of the pimp as their profile of choice. In fact, it is probably the most universal of roles rappers are toting. From the hard-core gangsta rap of 50 Cent to the commercially driven materialistic rap of P. Diddy, to the crunk sound of Lil’ Jon to the “southernplayalistic” rap of Outkast, from Nelly to Jay-Z, everybody wants to be a pimp. Even so-called conscious artists such as Common and Dead-Prez infuse their work with references to themselves as “pimps in recovery.”

Although the Oscar-awarded song suggests that white and Black women are equally accessible for exploitation, the fact is that white society long ago deemed the Black woman as the appropriate image of the prostitute or the “ho” that can be used and abused. That fact helps us to understand how such abuse of women can be celebrated in a country that prides itself on its supposed rights and freedoms for women. Black women are without respect in this regard. As long as Black women represent the image of the prostitute then it doesn’t threaten the American ideal of white womanhood as pristine and untarnished – the eternal virgin. This ideal remains intact no matter how many white female pop stars come along calling themselves Madonna in their attempt to undermine the racist/sexist trope that has justified the enslavement, rape and repression of Black women.

The American fascination with the pimp is an _expression of the perverted white social fixation with a warped Black sexuality. That fascination was present at the auction block, when whites would come and inspect and bid on the naked bodies of African men, women and children. That fascination was present at the plantation whipping post, when whites would strip enslaved Blacks and beat them mercilessly. That fascination was present at the lynching, when whole white communities would come out and watch a single Black man or woman or child stripped, mutilated and burned alive; taking home charred remains as souvenirs. That fascist fascination is found today in the voyeurism of white eyes as they watch their racist projections of Black sexuality acted out on the silver screen where they can in response project back onto the screen their personal deviant sexual proclivities; where they can live out their repressed sexual fantasies vicariously via commercialized Black flesh.

Rap music is the contemporary _expression that has been and is being used to reinforce an ideology that supports the continued exploitation of the most maligned and marginalized segment of U.S. society – Black women. With the popularity of rap music and rap-inspired films, the mainstreaming or normalization of the pimp has become a reality too. The Black pimp icon is a reactionary image that emerges from the actual prostitution of female bodies that occurs in oppressed communities. To understand how the pimp has emerged as an iconic figure in rap music, the social conditions that create and condone prostitution must be addressed.

The pimp is a consequence of poverty. According to some scholars, the pimp is an option for many inner-city Black men who have opted out of a system that long ago opted out on them. In Robin Kelley’s essay “The Riddle of the Zoot Suit,” he describes how the pimp emerged amidst a backdrop of hustling as an alternative lifestyle for some African Americans and Latinos during World War II. “As a number of criminologists and urban anthropologists have suggested, ‘hustling’ or similar kinds of informal/illicit economic strategies should be regarded as efforts to escape dependency on low-wage, alienating labor.” (Race Rebels, p. 174) It should be made clear that the pimp is not just a product of male poverty. Its very existence can be more aptly stated to be caused by female poverty. For in the pimp we find the person whose primary function is the exploitation of impoverished and impressionable young women. Kelley continues,
“The zoot-suiters and hipsters who sought alternatives to wage work and found pleasure in the new music, clothes, and dance styles of the period were “race rebels” of sorts, challenging middle-class ethics and expectations, carving out a distinct generational and ethnic identity, refusing to be good proletarians. But in their efforts to escape or minimize exploitation … [they] became exploiters themselves.” (163)

Joy James discusses this same historic period from the vantage of Black women. In her essay, “Depoliticizing Representations: Sexual-Racial Stereotypes,” she zeroes in on the abuse Black female prostitutes experienced not just from their pimps, but from the police as well.
“Black females were more visible to arresting officers gazing through a distorted social lens in New York City in the 1930s, where they constituted over 50 percent of detainees and were arrested at a rate ten times higher than that of white women … Black females who were not engaged in the sex trade but merely walking the streets could be harassed by police. Whether any crime had been committed or not, black females were linked with sexual vice …” (Shadowboxing, p. 137)

In the present, Black women are still linked with sexual vice in a society where conditions are still conducive for hustling. Black unemployment is off the charts. An ever-increasing number of Black and Latino youth buck the system and dodge enlistment in the armed forces, refusing to partake in what they understand is an unjust and unnecessary war. In so doing, they are resisting hegemonic notions of patriotism and American nationalism. This new generation of “race rebels” is finding alternatives to wage work in the hip hop inspired lifestyle of hustling as their hipster predecessors did in the jazz-inspired world of their day. The rationale for the zoot is renewed in the pursuit of the bling. But these rationales and pursuits are not justified in and of themselves as they are riddled with contradictions, not the least of which is the penchant to prey on impoverished and impressionable girls and young women. An alternative must be found to the “alternatives to wage work” that does not turn young girls into wage slaves of another kind.

The zoot-suited hipster has passed down to the baggy-jeaned homeboy the pimp lifestyle as something to strive for, something to take pride in. This striving has been spurred on by an American corporate sector that has turned this oppressive condition into a glamorized and self-perpetuating retro-reality. bell hooks has stated that,
“The contemporary glorification of male violence against women has caused the pimp, once a despised figure in communities, to be elevated to the status of hero. The pimp’s misogynist treatment of women was romanticized in movies like Sweet Sweetback or Cool World, and in books like Iceberg Slim that glorified his exploits.” (Aint I a Woman, p. 108)

These films and books and the writers that produced them have achieved cult status in the rap world. Artists like Jay-Z and Nas are known to pepper their lyrics with references to Donald Goines and Iceberg Slim, two of the most famous writers of pimp lit or street lit to emerge during the late Sixties, early Seventies. Ludacris in his rap song, “Eyebrows Down,” talks about how picked up books by Goines and got schooled to the “business” of hustling and pimping while still a teenager. But the best example of the influence of Blaxploitation films and books on hip hop artists is best summarized by self-described pimp Snoop Dogg himself, who receives “spiritual guidance” from none other than pimp turned preacher turned pimp-guru Bishop Don Juan. “When I started seeing those movies in the ‘70s, like ‘The Mack’ and ‘Superfly,’ that helped me to more or less pick who I wanted to be in life, how I wanted to live my life, how I wanted to represent me.” (Moody)

This sick and twisted “birth rite” passed from one generation of Black men to another via film and literature is wholly disturbing for it is predicated upon the subjugation and violation of Black women. The two cannot be separated. Pimping and the violent subjugation of women go hand in hand. You cannot separate the gold chalice and the pinky ring of the pimp from the busted lip and black eye of the young girls and women being prostituted. And no matter how many commercials Snoop appears in selling fabric softener, he cannot soften the hard-core reality of pimp life. To be a pimp means to be a predator.

No one knows how brutal pimping is better than celebrated pimp turned pimp-lit scribe Robert Beck better known as Iceberg Slim by rappers who treat his books with the same reverence Christians give the Gospel. “The best pimps I have known, that is the career pimps, the ones who could do twenty, maybe thirty years as a pimp, were utterly ruthless and brutal without compassion. They certainly had a basic hatred for women.” (Koblin)

Misogyny is the spirit that is pervasive in any form of male domination. That “basic hatred of women” takes form in the physical abuse women experience in prostitution. Women are not seen as human beings, but as sexual objects that can be manipulated, maligned and discarded. Kelley discusses this point further, “Women were merely objects through which hustling men sought leisure and pleasure; prey for financial and sexual exploitation.” Malcolm X reflecting on his life as street hustler Detroit Red in his Autobiography stated, “I believed that a man should do anything that he was slick enough, or bad and bold enough, to do and that a woman was nothing but another commodity.” Kelley continues, “Resistance to wage labor for the hep cat frequently meant increased oppression and exploitation of women, particularly black women. The hipsters of Malcolm’s generation and after took pride in their ability to establish parasitic relationships with women wage earners or sex workers.” (Race Rebels, p. 175)

That pride is still present in many rap artists and their male supporters. They wield a sordid charm in their repertoire of devices to manipulate the minds of young women who are too naïve to know when they are being played. But that charm soon wears thin as their thirst for control that lurks just beneath the veneer of their words is unveiled.

“Sweet talk and psychology were his main game. His aim was to look through the head of a whore and read her thoughts. If persuasion didn’t work he turned to violence. His prime bit was to roll up tow coat hangers into a truncheon and flail women’s naked backs until they bent to his will.” (West) This description is a far cry from the image presented in many rap videos of rappers draped in women clamoring for their affection. This is the true face of prostitution. This is the bruised face of prostitution.

Fear is the pimp’s main weapon in his arsenal of control techniques. “The hustler ethic demanded a public front of emotional detachment. Remaining ‘cool’ toward women was crucial to one’s public reputation and essential in a ‘business’ which depended on the control and brutal exploitation of female bodies. According to Beck, “the best pimps keep a steel lid on their emotions.” (Race Rebels, p. 176) Is there any wonder why many rappers created names for themselves that began with the word “ice”? The hook is not always meant to convey coolness as in being hip as much as it means to convey coldness as in being heartless.

In a rare interview in 1972 Beck was asked a direct question about the pimp’s role in the oppression of Black women. His response was just as direct.
“Koblin: The black pimp, as you were, has made his fortune through the total degradation of the black woman in this society. Is that true?

Beck: That’s true. And the tragedy is there, that the black woman is the bedrock of the black family unit. This is what is under direct assault. It occurred under the structured racism of America. When a black man turns out a black woman, he is denigrating the bedrock of family life in his community. Again, this is counterrevolutionary. Pimps are becoming an anachronism.” (Koblin)

Although Beck may have wished that pimping was going the way of the dinosaur, I wonder if he would be shocked to see just how wickedly popular the pimp has become. The pimp icon has moved beyond rap lyrics and B-rated movies to become an American metaphor infused with a multitude of meanings in mainstream media. There is MTV’s wildly popular reality show “Pimp My Ride,” where cars that should be en route to the nearest junk yard are customized to resemble a tricked-out pimp Caddy. Then there is rap artist Nelly’s Pimp Juice, an energy drink that survived an initial outcry to become one of the fastest selling power drinks on the international market. There were a couple of documentaries that came out at the start of the decade. One, Pimps Up, Hoes Down was aired on HBO’s series “Undercover American.” The film is the directorial debut of Brent Owens, known for his production management work on such films as Panther, New Jack City, Juice and Mo’ Betta Blues. The other documentary entitled American Pimp was directed by Hudlin Brothers of Menace II Society fame. Pimps even got their own cartoon. Lil’ Pimp is the animated story of a little white boy who learns the tricks of the pimping trade from Fruit Juice, a Black pimp whose voice is played by Bernie Mac. Mac is joined in this irreverent romp by a bevy of big-time Hollywood and rap stars including William Shatner, Lil’ Kim, Ludacris and Carmen Electra. This film was so reprehensible that Columbia Pictures decided not to show it in theaters, and instead sent it straight to video. I wonder if they regret that decision after the success of Hustle and Flow. There is even a website where white collar workers can learn how to “Pimp My Cubicle.” Far from becoming an anachronism, pimping has become an American past-time.

Some Black male rappers take pimping to be a form of reparations for slavery. “We’ve been pimped since we were ripped from the underbelly of Africa,” says rap artist David Banner. “We built America but never got paid for it, yet we get treated the worse. So pimping has always been part of our society, so to feel that we’re finally the pimps, why not embrace that?” (Moody) I can answer that: Because it means enslaving the other half of your community! That kind of reactionary response on the part of Black men is as tired and played as it was when Elridge Cleaver tried to justify his raping of Black women by saying that it was practice for the real “insurrectionary” act of raping white women. (Soul on Ice, p. 14)

Raping or pimping Black women is not pay back to white men or white society. When we as Black men rape or pimp Black women we are doing white supremacy’s bidding, not resisting it. White men are not hurt or pained by it. Nor are they disempowered by our behavior. The same is true for the rape of white women for that matter. All that does is reinforce the racist belief that we are sexual criminals who have a depraved craving for white female sexuality. The truth is that when we rape or otherwise sexually abuse and exploit women, we are manifesting the brutal force of patriarchy. We are acting as the oppressors we men are, regardless of our ethnicity or “race.”

In fact, we Black men have a curious relationship with white men as men that challenges our disdain for them. bell hooks clarifies this point when she writes,
“Sexism has always been a political stance mediating racial domination, enabling white men and black men to share a common sensibility about sex roles and the importance of male domination. Clearly both groups have equated freedom with manhood, and manhood with the right of men to have indiscriminate access to the bodies of women. Both groups have been socialized to condone patriarchal affirmation of rape as an acceptable way to maintain male domination. It is this merging of sexuality with male domination within patriarchy that informs the construction of masculinity for men of all races and classes.” (Yearning, p. 59)

This interracial sexist alliance amounts to a gang rape of Black womanhood.

This interracial gang rape mentality is best exemplified in the making of the blockbuster hit Hustle and Flow. Contrary to many people’s belief that the movie was a “Black film” made in the tradition of other Black pimp flicks in the Seventies, Hustle and Flow was written and directed by a white southerner by the name of Chris Brewer. Indeed Hustle and Flow harkens back to an even older tradition of white men creating outright racist representations called minstrel shows like Amos and Andy. Hustle and Flow is a neo-minstrel movie in that it is a contemporary cinematic projection of the white racist mind of Black life.

Just as white men during and after slavery created racist images of Black men as rapists and criminals to cover their homegrown sexist compulsion to rape and violate both Black and white women, Hustle and Flow is an outgrowth of that same white male supremacist thrust. Brewer has admitted that he was inspired to write the script by the events of his own personal life and marriage to his white wife as stated in this article published by Indiewire.com by Ellen Keohane.
Much of “Hustle and Flow” is based on experiences from Craig Brewer’s own life. When he and his wife Jodi moved to Memphis in the mid-1990s, they didn’t have any money. “My wife and I were really struggling,” said Brewer. Jodi, a costume designer, started making outfits for strippers for extra cash, then worked as a waitress at a strip club and later began stripping there. (One of the characters in “Hustle & Flow” is a stripper and several scenes take place in a local strip club.) “Part of me thought, wow, this will be an adventure,” said Brewer. “We started to roll with a very different element. At the same time, the lifestyle started to rob our souls a little bit. (emphasis mine) (Keohane)
The racism should be obvious. Rather than defy the white supremacist lie and write a script that details how he prostituted his wife to make ends, he realized that he would make millions more if he kept with the “master narrative” that images Black men as pimps and Black women as whores. Images that white America can readily embrace.

Joy James discusses a similar case of white male racist/sexist projection. Quoting an interview that appeared in Essence magazine, James writes,
“Writing that porn videos featuring black and interracial couples appear designed for white male viewers, Santiago refers to video writer-director William Marigold, who states that, for him, any appeal to black male viewers ‘is purely accidental.’ Santiago then quotes Marigold: ‘When I put Blacks in my videos, I project my fantasies, not theirs.’” (Shadowboxing, p. 140)
In Hustle and Flow Brewer, like Marigold and most other white photographers, filmmakers, directors and producers, is acting out his taboo sexist fantasies by masking white male perversion in Black skin. The agenda, purpose and motivation of the characters have nothing to do with Black life, but everything to do with white male psychosis.

If he had written a film about his own experience, undoubtedly he would have had to face his personal sexism and his personal complicity in the system of patriarchy and male domination as a white man. In so doing, he would also have had to come to terms on some level with his own demons and the demons of his white brethren who have raped, exploited and abused women of every hue since European colonization. White men are the only men known to have raped women for the sole purpose of producing workers they could exploit. We are talking about the actual oppression of their progeny. Then to top it off, they justified such barbarity by sanctioning it in within their laws and religious doctrines. Talk about big pimping. You don’t get any bigger than that!

Brewer would be assisted in this endeavor by none other than John Singleton of Boys N the Hood fame. Singleton, in his role as the film’s executive producer, served as the necessary Black stamp-of-approval that dissuaded the fears of nervous Hollywood execs concerned about a possible Black backlash. Just as Dr. Dre’s role as producer of Eminem enabled Eminem to gain the necessary street cred he would not have been able garner on his own, Singleton’s presence enabled Hustle and Flow to gain a ghetto authenticity that Brewer could not have pulled off with his “Hee-Haw” look and persona.

How do we justify “pro-Black” Singleton’s involvement? We can’t! Of course, Singleton would probably state that this is not your typical pimp flick. I guess he would call it “Pimp-Lite.” Even though the main character DJay is portrayed as a reluctant Black pimp, he is still no less an exploiter. He still wields abusive power over the women in his house. We see several scenes where the threat of the pimp slap is constantly lingering in the humid air. It is that threat of violence that marks his control over the young women’s lives. The racist imaginary continues in the depiction of the women as well. Only the white prostitute is given a semblance of agency. She is the only one who seeks an escape from prostitution. She is the only one of the three who actually asserts herself beyond mere whoredom by the film’s end. In the Black women we see two favorite stereotypes deployed. One is of the hardened, foul-mouthed Black woman who despises Black men. The other is the whiney, weak and helpless Black woman. Both are too beat-down and oppressed to fight against their oppression, so they are forced by their condition to submit to it and engage in self-destructive behavior. There is nothing new about this movie or its depiction of Black people. Brewer’s interpretation of Black life is no different fundamentally from D. W. Griffith’s interpretation in Birth of a Nation. If he were alive, he would give the film four stars. The film only fosters and reinforces age-old codes and icons of white supremacy.

I wonder if Singleton would be down with a film that put a happy face on slavery. In this film, the main character is a white slave master who is conflicted with his role as slave owner and wants to get out the “game.” So he decides he’ll make a living by writing about whipping “them niggers,” rather than actually beating his slaves. He then commences to record the lyrics over the sampled beat of “Whistlin’ Dixie.” He coerces one of his enslaved field hands named Sambo to sing the hook “It’s Hard out Here for a Cracker” as we witness a whip hanging on the wall just behind Sambo as he stutters through his lines.

Singleton’s involvement in the making of Hustle and Flow exposes the continuing contradiction of African American manhood. Our notions of Black nationalism and Black struggle remain narrow and limiting when we act out our patriarchal prerogative and fail to accord to Black women the same sensitivity and respect for their experience that we demand from the system for ours. Singleton’s concern was not with the way the Black women are viewed. His own films are notorious for replicating stereotypical depictions of Black women. Rather, his concern was whether the Black man would be perceived as redeemable. But there is no redemption to be found in this film. The stretch from a pimp that actually exploits women to a rapper that talks about exploiting women is no stretch at all. It is simply the record of the reality.

What the film does show is that the pimp aspiration is the same as the rapper aspiration: Power. In search of said power, DJay as pimp and DJay as rapper are both willing to exploit women to make their dreams come true. Rap artists know this and have acted accordingly. The modern day rapper presents an ideological defense, an aesthetic apologia, for the pimp and what the pimp represents: the brutal repression of women. What other purpose is there for songs like “Its Hard Out Here for a Pimp”? The song is an anthem for male domination. It is machismo remixed for the new millennium.

Beck identifies this connection between the pimp and the president. “So you can see how utterly poisoning and trapping it all is. Once anybody has pimped he is in trouble because this is what the male aspiration is … whether he is the president of a white corporation, of General Motors for example. It all boils down to the same thing … Power.” (Koblin) Herein lies the crux of the system of patriarchy; its main purpose is the manly pursuit of power manifested as control over the lives, bodies and minds of women.

The system is turning us out as a people. We are both the prostitute and the john. We pay to see ourselves exploited on the screen. We pay to listen to ourselves exploited on the CD player. We are paying with money, and we are paying with our souls. It is the best indication of just how deeply colonized we still are.

Today we are witnessing the rise of a Black bourgeoisie in Hollywood that has made its ascension upon the backs of their Black kinfolk who still exist in the hoods they have escaped from. Their notion of giving back is not producing films that honor the struggle of the Black poor, nor do their films instruct impoverished Blacks on how to fight against the system. Rather, their films exploit the Black poor; makes a mockery of their plight so they can make millions. The message of their movies is for the poor to grovel at the bottom, fighting and abusing each other, rather than against those who are responsible for their misery in the first place. More and more it will be these moneyed Blacks who will sit in the very places once reserved for white executives. And that will not be a cause for celebration, for they will not be our ambassadors but our oppressors by proxy. These are the true “hos” of the system, who have been able to benefit from prostituting themselves to the white industrial pimps they turn tricks for, while passing onto their people the abuse and suffering that should be theirs too.

Paramount Classics, the company that picked up the film from Sundance and distributed it into theaters across the globe, was on its financial death bed in the early part of the decade. But Hustle and Flow changed all that. “It’s the best summer we had,” according to David Dinerstein, Paramount corporate exec. Hustle and Flow made over $20 million for Paramount Classics. Their next best flick came in a distance second, making a measly $7 million in comparison. (Sperling)

Tom Freston, the white man who became co-president and co-CEO of Viacom in June 2004, oversees MTV Networks, BET, Showtime, Simon and Schuster and Paramount Pictures. Tom Freston’s ability to reproduce racist/sexist images of Black women en masse in a variety of lucrative outlets is a throw back to his plantation predecessors. As Barbara Omolade states in her essay “Hearts of Darkness,”
To the slave master, the Black woman “was a fragmented commodity whose feelings and choices were rarely considered: her head and her heart were separated from her back and her hands were divided from her womb and vagina. … Her vagina … was the gateway to the womb, which was his place of capital investment – the capital investment being the sex act, and the resulting child the accumulated surplus, worth money on the slave market.”(Words of Fire, p. 366)

Just as Tom Freston’s white male ancestors were able to reap tremendous profits from the wholesale exploitation of Black women’s bodies, so to Freston and his corporate contemporaries are reaping tremendous profits from the wholesale depiction of Black women’s bodies. This time the capital investment is not the actual sex act, but in the act of reproducing images of Black women that reinforce racist/sexist notions and structures of domination.

This is possible for the same reasons it was possible during slavery. Black women and the Black community are an oppressed class of people in the United States. The very nature of capitalism is based on the exploitation of oppressed classes. As Angela Davis clarifies,
“It would appear, therefore, that those men who wield power in the economic and political realm are encouraged by the class structure of capitalism to become agents of sexual exploitation. Their authority guards them against punishment in all circles except one: they may not violate a woman of their own standing.” (The Angela Davis Reader, p. 135)

In the hierarchy of patriarchy, white men wield the most power. But that fact does not excuse or render Black men less responsible for our complicity in the system white men have devised for their profit. In fact, given our history and condition, we should be the first to resist the sexist exploitation of Black women rather than be first in line to reap a little profit for ourselves.

Rather than face up to our complicity in the exploitation of Black women and organize against the system, some Black men have tried to justify their position by claiming that they are pimping the system. One such rap group called Dead Prez has gone as far as to make a song and video that does just that. “Hell Yeah (Pimp the System)” is Dead Prez’s response to the dead-end reality that is faced by many of the Black working poor. Rather than pimp each other, they say, “pimp the system.”

This hip hop slogan is problematic coming from a rap group that proclaims itself revolutionary for a couple of reasons. First, it gives credibility to pimping and prostitution by its mere use of the word. Ideologically this is debilitating because it places us in the disempowered position of fighting on the system’s terms by using their very terms in fact. That is not revolutionary. Trying to disconnect pimping from its real purpose of oppressing women, and turning it into some radical act is a sign of political weakness and a lack of cultural vision. In fact is a trap. It is just not possible for the system to be pimped. The system already knows how to handle petty crime, which is what they suggest poor Blacks do to get back at the system. Smacking up the pizza delivery boy and stealing his meager funds will not free anybody. If anything, it will achieve just the opposite – jail. And our people are already over-represented in the penitentiaries.

The video actually ends with cops breaking in to their hide-out and arresting them. Dead Prez unable to cast a libratory vision for their scheme, turns it into a bad dream with them waking up in pre-colonial Africa surrounded a bevy of Black women lying all around them. The “ghetto ho” becomes the “Afrocentric queen.” Different image, same role: service the Black man. Which brings us back to the original issue: If you can’t pimp the “The Man,” then pimp the sistah. With “Pimp the System” Dead Prez doesn’t offer any viable solution, just more of the same.

Trying to find a little pocket in the system to pilfer, which, in the end, amounts to ripping off other poor people in the hood, is just another ridiculous ploy by a rap group at gaining street cred. Why else would Jay-Z appear on the song’s remix? Their attempt at converting self-proclaimed rapper-pimps falls right on its face. In the end, Jay-Z doesn’t change his ideological position as it pertains to the treatment of Black women or his relationship to capitalism. It is all a charade that only lends itself to confusing our youth. Both Dead Prez and Jay-Z share the same corporate sponsorship. That might better explain the reason for them working together on the track.

As has been stated, the prostitute cannot pimp the pimp. The prostitute’s only real option is to resist the pimp and get free. Our people’s only real option to end our misery under this corrupt system is organized resistance against it. Malcolm X settled the question back in 1965 when he said; “The system in this country cannot produce freedom for an African American. It is impossible for this system, this economic system, this political system, this social system, this system, period.” (The Last Year of Malcolm X, p. 43) Dead Prez should know better. But maybe they too have fallen victim to the dollarism Malcolm also addressed given their contractual relationship to corporate giant Columbia Records. “You can cuss out colonialism, imperialism and all other kinds of ism, but it’s hard for you to cuss that dollarism. When they drop those dollars on you, your soul goes.” (The Last Year of Malcolm X, p. 42)

Capitalism doesn’t care how much you rave and rant against it as long as you don’t actively resist it. And you cannot actively resist it while you are being pimped by it. It will even provide you with a stage so you can get paid to complain about how bad the system is. All the while, capitalism takes your ranting all the way to the bank and cashes in on your complaint.

Pimps are known to keep their prostitutes in check by playing mind games on them. In the film Hustle and Flow DJay manipulates his prostitutes by convincing them that they were in charge, when in fact he was. A real mind game is being played on our people under this system. This American free market system tells us that we are in control; that we can do whatever we want within the system. And we are falling for it. Far too many of us believe that capitalism is a good system. We have been so miseducated about how this system works. We are not taught that it is set up to keep the majority of us impoverished. We are not taught that its very existence depends on the exploitation of our labor. We have to recognize our power and use it to recreate the system. This is not folly or wide-eyed idealism. Our people are responsible for the two major economic and social shifts that have ever occurred in U.S. history. It was our ancestors and predecessors that ended slavery and later Jim Crow segregation. That potential still lives within us. It comes down to a question of priorities. Are we satisfied with groveling at the bottom, while a few of our people manipulate our desires for real power and control over our lives via music videos and Hollywood films? Have we become comfortable with customizing our poverty to make it appear flashier and more stylish than it really it is? Or are we really ready to make a new reality?

The system doesn’t have a conscience that would cause it to respond to moral suasion. Capitalism cannot be compelled to quit exploiting our people and certainly not the women in our community. Only when we come out of the studios, out of the theaters, and organize ourselves will the (s)exploitation of our people cease. If we are against the system, if we despise what white men have done to us, then let us fight, not to find our niche so that we can get in on the action of profiteering from the abuse of women, but fight against the forces that has our people locked down in real life cells while they sell our warped image to the world.

The value we place on Black women as evidenced in the numerous videos and films that we support only works to devalue their potential as self-defining and self-determining beings. Our value of Black women must move beyond being centered in how much pleasure they can bring us. It must move beyond a selfish and distorted appreciation for how good they look or how good they can dance or to what new level they can cause our libidos to rise. Our value of them must be anchored in an appreciation for their minds and their spirits. Minds and spirits that have the potential to create a new reality for themselves and thus, for our people. Minds and spirits that can cause our people to rise to new liberating levels of self-awareness and self-determination.

No, the system doesn’t have a soul. But we do. What is the condition of our soul when we pay top dollar to see our people exploited? Today, we are the ones showing up at the auction block bidding on our own people. What has become of us? The world has gained a distorted and dehumanizing image of our people as it is beamed all over the planet. We, in return, have gained nothing. In the process we are raising a generation that lacks a fundamental love and respect for each other and ourselves. Call me a “playa hater” if you must. But the truth of the matter, my brothers, is that you are not playas. You are just the ones being played.

Bibliography

Breitman, George. The Last Year of Malcolm X: The Evolution of a Revolutionary. New York: Pathfinder Press, 1967.

Cleaver, Eldridge. Soul on Ice. New York: Dell Publishing, 1968.

Guy-Sheftall, Beverly, ed. Words of Fire: An Anthology of African-American Feminist Thought. New York: The Free Press, 1995.

hooks, bell. Ain’t I a Woman: Black Women and Feminism. Boston: South End Press, 1981.

hooks, bell. Yearning: Race, Gender, and Cultural Politics. Boston: South End Press, 1990.

James, Joy. Shadowboxing: Representations of Black Feminist Politics. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1999.

James, Joy, ed. The Angela Davis Reader. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 1998.

Kelley, Robin D.G. Race Rebels: Culture, Politics and the Black Working Class. New York: The Free Press, 1996.

Keohane, Ellen. “The ‘Hustle and Flow’ of Independent Film, Writer/Director Craig Brewer and Producer Stephanie Allain on Their Upcoming Film.” Web page: http://www.indiewire.com/people/people_050718hustle.html

Koblin, Helen. “Portrait of a Pimp.” Los Angeles Free Press, Vol 9, No 8 (Feb 25-Mar 2, 1972) Web page: http://www.popsubculture.com/pop/bio_project/sub/iceberg_slim1.html

Moody, Nekesa Mumbi. “Pimps: The New ‘Gangstas’ of Rap.” Web page: http://www.story.news.yahoo.com/news…_pimpin_1

Sperling, Nicole. “Revival Under way at Paramount Classics.” Web page: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr/film/feature_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001056909

West, Hollie I. “Sweet Talk, Hustle and Muscle,” The Washington Post (1973) Web page: http://www.popsubculture.com/pop/bio_project/sub/iceberg_slim2.html

Ewuare Osayande is a political activist and author of several books including Blood Luxury and the forthcoming Misogyny and the Emcee. He is co-founder of POWER (People Organized Working to Eradicate Racism) and is creator of ONUS: Redefining Black Manhood. He can be reached at OsayandeSpeaks@hotmail.com.

Ewuare Osayande

Author of Blood Luxury

http://www.osayande.org/

(Article courtesy of Assata Speaks! Hands Off Assata-Let’s Get Free-Revolutionary Pan-Africanism-Black On Purpose-Forum)

3 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS?

Please view the video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zc_xmq09eok

What is your impression of the man?

Of the woman?

How should the young man have handled the situation?

The young woman?

What do you think of Black-Jewish relations in America?

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized